A Social Risk‐Based Approach Supporting Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive Framework

ABSTRACT Social sustainability is difficult to measure due to its qualitative and context‐specific nature. However, regulatory pressure and stakeholder expectations increasingly require organisations to disclose robust and verifiable information. In this context, the European Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) sets new sustainability reporting standards. This paper proposes a social risk‐based decision‐making approach that integrates Social Organisational Life Cycle Assessment (SO‐LCA) and risk assessment tools to enhance reporting accuracy and transparency. A methodological framework was developed to combine SO‐LCA principles with a social risk mapping tool (RMT), aligned with CSRD requirements. A case study was conducted on a multinational packaging company operating in 16 countries. This study assessed the impact category ‘Labour Rights and Decent Work Conditions’ using the Social Hotspot Database (SHDB) RMT. Indicators were mapped against the CSRD's ‘Own Workforce’ reporting datapoints (EFRAG IG3 2024). The risk mapping identified significant variations in social risks across geographies. India, Thailand and China emerged with the highest frequencies of very high‐risk indicators, whereas Germany and France showed the best performance. The results provide prioritisation insights for monitoring and mitigation actions. Cross‐analysis confirmed strong alignment between RMT indicators and mandatory CSRD disclosure points. SO‐LCA and CSRD are complementary tools for social risk governance. Integrating social life cycle thinking into reporting improves decision‐making, enhances transparency and supports compliance. The proposed approach provides a practical pathway for companies to structure social data collection, identify social hotspots and align with evolving EU sustainability requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70459
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Social Risk‐Based Approach Supporting Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive Framework

Monica Serreli, Luigia Petti, Manuela D'Eusanio
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

A Social Risk‐Based Approach Supporting Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive Framework

Monica Serreli, Luigia Petti, Manuela D'Eusanio
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Social sustainability is difficult to measure due to its qualitative and context‐specific nature. However, regulatory pressure and stakeholder expectations increasingly require organisations to disclose robust and verifiable information. In this context, the European Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) sets new sustainability reporting standards. This paper proposes a social risk‐based decision‐making approach that integrates Social Organisational Life Cycle Assessment (SO‐LCA) and risk assessment tools to enhance reporting accuracy and transparency. A methodological framework was developed to combine SO‐LCA principles with a social risk mapping tool (RMT), aligned with CSRD requirements. A case study was conducted on a multinational packaging company operating in 16 countries. This study assessed the impact category ‘Labour Rights and Decent Work Conditions’ using the Social Hotspot Database (SHDB) RMT. Indicators were mapped against the CSRD's ‘Own Workforce’ reporting datapoints (EFRAG IG3 2024). The risk mapping identified significant variations in social risks across geographies. India, Thailand and China emerged with the highest frequencies of very high‐risk indicators, whereas Germany and France showed the best performance. The results provide prioritisation insights for monitoring and mitigation actions. Cross‐analysis confirmed strong alignment between RMT indicators and mandatory CSRD disclosure points. SO‐LCA and CSRD are complementary tools for social risk governance. Integrating social life cycle thinking into reporting improves decision‐making, enhances transparency and supports compliance. The proposed approach provides a practical pathway for companies to structure social data collection, identify social hotspots and align with evolving EU sustainability requirements.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
San Raffaele University of Rome (IT), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Social Risk‐Based Approach Supporting Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive Framework — Monica Serreli, Luigia Petti, et al. · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS