Exploring equity in audit and feedback trials: Secondary analysis of a systematic review

A&F trials rarely examine or report the extent to which equity issues inform trial design, A&F processes, analyses, and/or interpretations. Our findings suggest a need for future A&F trials that test explicit approaches to incorporating equity-related interventions to address health equity by helping healthcare professionals, teams, and organizations to be more aware of inappropriate discrepancies in care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339361
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring equity in audit and feedback trials: Secondary analysis of a systematic review

Aïsha Lofters, Thomas A. Willis, Lynne Moore, Armaghan Dabbagh et al.
PLoS ONE
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Exploring equity in audit and feedback trials: Secondary analysis of a systematic review

Aïsha Lofters, Thomas A. Willis, Lynne Moore, Armaghan Dabbagh, Janyce Gnanvi, Camille Renee, Ambreen Ahmed Sayani, Aranee Senthilmurugan, Victor Cattani Rentes, Zeenat Ladak, Camille S. Williams, Mary Carter, Heather A. Shepherd, Tolulope Ojo, Tasneem Khan, Noah Michael Ivers
article en

Abstract

A&F trials rarely examine or report the extent to which equity issues inform trial design, A&F processes, analyses, and/or interpretations. Our findings suggest a need for future A&F trials that test explicit approaches to incorporating equity-related interventions to address health equity by helping healthcare professionals, teams, and organizations to be more aware of inappropriate discrepancies in care.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(3)
University of Leeds (GB), University of Toronto (CA), University of Exeter (GB), Women's College Hospital (CA), Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus (CA), Université Laval (CA)
Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring equity in audit and feedback trials: Secondary analysis of a systematic review — Aïsha Lofters, Thomas A. Willis, et al. · PLoS ONE (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS