Decoding Positional Variability in U18 Semi-Professional Soccer Players: A Principal Component Analysis Utilizing Inertial Measurement Units to Identify Key Determinants

This study investigates the performance characteristics of U18 semi-professional soccer players by examining both technical load (TL) and physical load (PL) variables across various playing positions during the 2021/2022 Spanish Football U18 National League Championship. Methods: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was employed to simplify the dataset, which comprised 246 match records from 49 athletes (mean age 17.9 ± 0.7 years; height ~177.6 ± 6.3 cm; body mass ~72.0 ± 7.2 kg) across ten matches. This analytical approach aimed to facilitate a deeper understanding of player performance dynamics. Results: Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) values varied across positions (technical load: 0.20–0.93; physical load: 0.27–0.91). This indicates acceptable sampling adequacy for several positional models, but low adequacy for others; therefore, results for positions with low-KMO values should be interpreted cautiously. Factor analysis for both technical and physical load variables identified two components each, explaining substantial total variance (technical load: 63.75–86.65%; and physical load: 71.74–88.92% across position), with significantly high factor correlations (p < 0.001). The findings further indicate that players occupying defensive positions, such as goalkeepers and center-backs, generally exhibit lower levels of physical intensity and technical engagement compared to their counterparts in more dynamic roles, including full-backs, wingers, and forwards. The latter groups demonstrate higher involvement in high-intensity running and offensive actions. Conclusions: The observed performance patterns highlight the necessity for tailored training programs that align with the specific demands of each playing position. This approach is expected to optimize individual player performance and enhance overall tactical efficiency. Furthermore, the study underscores the importance of developing individualized conditioning strategies that address the unique physical and technical requirements inherent to each role on the field. This analytical approach using PCA provides a more structured and data-driven understanding of these positional differences, reinforming the need for tailored training programs and individualized conditioning strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052596
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding Positional Variability in U18 Semi-Professional Soccer Players: A Principal Component Analysis Utilizing Inertial Measurement Units to Identify Key Determinants

José Antonio Sánchez Fuentes, Luis Manuel Martínez-Aranda, Ana Filipa Silva, José Carlos Barbero-Álvarez et al.
Applied Sciences
Sports Performance and Training
article

Decoding Positional Variability in U18 Semi-Professional Soccer Players: A Principal Component Analysis Utilizing Inertial Measurement Units to Identify Key Determinants

José Antonio Sánchez Fuentes, Luis Manuel Martínez-Aranda, Ana Filipa Silva, José Carlos Barbero-Álvarez, Filipe Manuel Clemente
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the performance characteristics of U18 semi-professional soccer players by examining both technical load (TL) and physical load (PL) variables across various playing positions during the 2021/2022 Spanish Football U18 National League Championship. Methods: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was employed to simplify the dataset, which comprised 246 match records from 49 athletes (mean age 17.9 ± 0.7 years; height ~177.6 ± 6.3 cm; body mass ~72.0 ± 7.2 kg) across ten matches. This analytical approach aimed to facilitate a deeper understanding of player performance dynamics. Results: Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) values varied across positions (technical load: 0.20–0.93; physical load: 0.27–0.91). This indicates acceptable sampling adequacy for several positional models, but low adequacy for others; therefore, results for positions with low-KMO values should be interpreted cautiously. Factor analysis for both technical and physical load variables identified two components each, explaining substantial total variance (technical load: 63.75–86.65%; and physical load: 71.74–88.92% across position), with significantly high factor correlations (p < 0.001). The findings further indicate that players occupying defensive positions, such as goalkeepers and center-backs, generally exhibit lower levels of physical intensity and technical engagement compared to their counterparts in more dynamic roles, including full-backs, wingers, and forwards. The latter groups demonstrate higher involvement in high-intensity running and offensive actions. Conclusions: The observed performance patterns highlight the necessity for tailored training programs that align with the specific demands of each playing position. This approach is expected to optimize individual player performance and enhance overall tactical efficiency. Furthermore, the study underscores the importance of developing individualized conditioning strategies that address the unique physical and technical requirements inherent to each role on the field. This analytical approach using PCA provides a more structured and data-driven understanding of these positional differences, reinforming the need for tailored training programs and individualized conditioning strategies.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(5)
Universidad de Granada (ES), Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra (PT), Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport (PL), University of Coimbra (PT), Universidad de Murcia (ES), Universidad Pablo de Olavide (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.