Will customers buy financial products impulsively? AI-powered chatbots’ recommendations

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine what factors can drive financial institution (FI) customers’ impulse buying decisions in artificial intelligence (AI)–powered environments. Based on the stimulus–organism–response (S-O-R) model, this study tests the influences of perceived human-likeness and perceived interactivity on trust in AI chatbot recommendations and impulse buying, perceived warmth and perceived competence as mediators and need for human interaction as a moderator. Design/methodology/approach Sample data for this study were collected from Taiwanese customers who had received product recommendations from AI-powered chatbots provided by financial institutions in Taiwan. A final sample size of 388 usable questionnaires was obtained, and structural equation modeling was conducted to validate the research model. Findings This study showed that FI customers’ perceived human-likeness and perceived interactivity positively influenced their perceived warmth and perceived competence, which together explained their trust in AI chatbot recommendations, and in turn uplifted their impulse buying. Besides, this study showed that FI customers’ need for human interaction significantly moderated some path relationships in the research model. Originality/value Based on the SOR framework, this original study contributes to the literature for understanding the formation of FI customers’ trust in AI chatbot recommendations and impulse buying by integrating the computers-are-social-actors paradigm, stereotype content model and elaboration likelihood model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asia Business Studies
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jabs-06-2025-0340
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Will customers buy financial products impulsively? AI-powered chatbots’ recommendations

Yung-Ming Cheng
Journal of Asia Business Studies
AI in Service Interactions
article

Will customers buy financial products impulsively? AI-powered chatbots’ recommendations

Yung-Ming Cheng
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine what factors can drive financial institution (FI) customers’ impulse buying decisions in artificial intelligence (AI)–powered environments. Based on the stimulus–organism–response (S-O-R) model, this study tests the influences of perceived human-likeness and perceived interactivity on trust in AI chatbot recommendations and impulse buying, perceived warmth and perceived competence as mediators and need for human interaction as a moderator. Design/methodology/approach Sample data for this study were collected from Taiwanese customers who had received product recommendations from AI-powered chatbots provided by financial institutions in Taiwan. A final sample size of 388 usable questionnaires was obtained, and structural equation modeling was conducted to validate the research model. Findings This study showed that FI customers’ perceived human-likeness and perceived interactivity positively influenced their perceived warmth and perceived competence, which together explained their trust in AI chatbot recommendations, and in turn uplifted their impulse buying. Besides, this study showed that FI customers’ need for human interaction significantly moderated some path relationships in the research model. Originality/value Based on the SOR framework, this original study contributes to the literature for understanding the formation of FI customers’ trust in AI chatbot recommendations and impulse buying by integrating the computers-are-social-actors paradigm, stereotype content model and elaboration likelihood model.

Journal of Asia Business Studies
Chaoyang University of Technology (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.