Translating Graduate Level Engineering Methods for K12 Students

Advanced engineering tools such as particle image velocimetry (PIV) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are rarely introduced in K12 education despite their relevance in modeling engineering systems. This study evaluates whether K12 students can meaningfully engage with these traditional graduate-level methods when applied to cardiovascular flows and delivered through structured modules. A 5-day full-time summer class was designed and enrolled 13 secondary students (grades 9–11) to introduce them to 3D printing, coding, PIV, medical image segmentation, and CFD modeling. Students participated in both experimental and computational activities and completed two evaluation forms assessing learning outcomes, instructional methods, challenges, and overall impressions. Students demonstrated improved conceptual understanding of fluid dynamics and biomedical applications. However, confidence varied; only 46.2% felt confident using the PIV setup, and 58.3% were comfortable running a CFD simulation. Live demonstrations were highly rated, while coding and software navigation were reported as major challenges. Despite fatigue and occasional mismatched expectations, 91.7% of participants said they would recommend the class, and most saw future relevance in the tools presented. Advanced engineering tools can be successfully adapted for secondary students when paired with appropriate instructional design, biomedical relevance, and scaffolded support. This approach promotes STEM engagement and literacy and supports broader efforts to strengthen the STEM pipeline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Engineering Education
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-026-00218-9
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translating Graduate Level Engineering Methods for K12 Students

Hoda Hatoum, Ahmad Bshennaty, Joey Marano
Biomedical Engineering Education
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

Translating Graduate Level Engineering Methods for K12 Students

Hoda Hatoum, Ahmad Bshennaty, Joey Marano
article en

Abstract

Advanced engineering tools such as particle image velocimetry (PIV) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are rarely introduced in K12 education despite their relevance in modeling engineering systems. This study evaluates whether K12 students can meaningfully engage with these traditional graduate-level methods when applied to cardiovascular flows and delivered through structured modules. A 5-day full-time summer class was designed and enrolled 13 secondary students (grades 9–11) to introduce them to 3D printing, coding, PIV, medical image segmentation, and CFD modeling. Students participated in both experimental and computational activities and completed two evaluation forms assessing learning outcomes, instructional methods, challenges, and overall impressions. Students demonstrated improved conceptual understanding of fluid dynamics and biomedical applications. However, confidence varied; only 46.2% felt confident using the PIV setup, and 58.3% were comfortable running a CFD simulation. Live demonstrations were highly rated, while coding and software navigation were reported as major challenges. Despite fatigue and occasional mismatched expectations, 91.7% of participants said they would recommend the class, and most saw future relevance in the tools presented. Advanced engineering tools can be successfully adapted for secondary students when paired with appropriate instructional design, biomedical relevance, and scaffolded support. This approach promotes STEM engagement and literacy and supports broader efforts to strengthen the STEM pipeline.

Biomedical Engineering Education
Michigan Technological University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.