Uterosacral Versus Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension in Pelvic Organ Prolapse: An RCT

Both HUSLS and SSF are safe and effective for apical prolapse repair, offering comparable anatomic and functional outcomes at 1-year follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urogynecology
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001830
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uterosacral Versus Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension in Pelvic Organ Prolapse: An RCT

V. N. Jha, Supriya subhi, Garima Goyal, Sangam Jha
Urogynecology
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

Uterosacral Versus Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension in Pelvic Organ Prolapse: An RCT

V. N. Jha, Supriya subhi, Garima Goyal, Sangam Jha
article en

Abstract

Both HUSLS and SSF are safe and effective for apical prolapse repair, offering comparable anatomic and functional outcomes at 1-year follow-up.

Urogynecology
Patna University (IN), Asian Development Research Institute (IN), Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (CN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.