Safety and Efficacy of Recaticimab in Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Dyslipidemia is an established risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Recaticimab is a novel humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically targets proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). It has shown promising results in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Here, we aim to further investigate the safety and efficacy of recaticimab in patients with dyslipidemia. We comprehensively searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing recaticimab with placebo. Eligible RCTs were selected, and their data were extracted and analyzed using the RevMan software. Four studies involving 1657 patients were included in this meta-analysis. In terms of efficacy outcomes, compared with the placebo group, recaticimab significantly decreased levels of LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), triglyceride (TG), and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], with the following values, respectively: (mean difference (MD): -52.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-57.25, -47.99], p < 0.00001); (MD: -47.03, 95% CI [-48.96, -45.11], p < 0.00001); (MD: -44.33, 95% CI [-46.08, -42.58], p < 0.00001); (MD: -8.83, 95% CI [-13.03, -4.63], p < 0.0001); and (MD: -29.21, 95% CI [-32.10, -26.31], p < 0.00001). In terms of safety outcomes, there was no significant difference between recaticimab and placebo groups in the incidence of any adverse events (odds ratio (OR): 1.16, 95% CI [0.90, 1.51], p = 0.26), serious adverse events, upper respiratory tract infections, or elevations in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), or gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT). However, recaticimab was associated with higher odds of injection site reactions compared with placebo (OR: 2.65, 95% CI [1.24, 5.67], p = 0.01). Recaticimab significantly reduced LDL-C levels and was associated with a manageable safety profile, even with dosing intervals of up to 12 weeks. Further studies should be conducted globally in larger and more diverse patient populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.70129
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and Efficacy of Recaticimab in Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Ahmed Elsherbeeny, Mohammed R. Abdeldayem
Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Safety and Efficacy of Recaticimab in Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Ahmed Elsherbeeny, Mohammed R. Abdeldayem
article en

Abstract

Dyslipidemia is an established risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Recaticimab is a novel humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically targets proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). It has shown promising results in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Here, we aim to further investigate the safety and efficacy of recaticimab in patients with dyslipidemia. We comprehensively searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing recaticimab with placebo. Eligible RCTs were selected, and their data were extracted and analyzed using the RevMan software. Four studies involving 1657 patients were included in this meta-analysis. In terms of efficacy outcomes, compared with the placebo group, recaticimab significantly decreased levels of LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), triglyceride (TG), and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], with the following values, respectively: (mean difference (MD): -52.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-57.25, -47.99], p < 0.00001); (MD: -47.03, 95% CI [-48.96, -45.11], p < 0.00001); (MD: -44.33, 95% CI [-46.08, -42.58], p < 0.00001); (MD: -8.83, 95% CI [-13.03, -4.63], p < 0.0001); and (MD: -29.21, 95% CI [-32.10, -26.31], p < 0.00001). In terms of safety outcomes, there was no significant difference between recaticimab and placebo groups in the incidence of any adverse events (odds ratio (OR): 1.16, 95% CI [0.90, 1.51], p = 0.26), serious adverse events, upper respiratory tract infections, or elevations in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), or gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT). However, recaticimab was associated with higher odds of injection site reactions compared with placebo (OR: 2.65, 95% CI [1.24, 5.67], p = 0.01). Recaticimab significantly reduced LDL-C levels and was associated with a manageable safety profile, even with dosing intervals of up to 12 weeks. Further studies should be conducted globally in larger and more diverse patient populations.

Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug TherapyVol. 46(4)
Kafrelsheikh University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.