Artificial Intelligence in Defense: A Bioethical Examination of Societal Risks and Governance

This paper explores the societal risks that may arise from the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into defense innovations and examines how the principle of responsibility can be achieved in this context.Using a qualitative descriptiveanalytical approach grounded in international reports and prior studies, the paper identifies four critical domains of societal risk: threats to human life, terrorist misuse, cyber and electronic warfare, and the lack of accountability for actions committed by autonomous or semi-autonomous systems.To address these challenges, a tri-level framework of responsibility is proposed -international, institutional, and socio-cultural-linking global ethical norms with local governance practices and moral values.The study argues that responsible innovation in AI-driven defense technologies requires ethical governance that ensures accountability, human oversight, and societal legitimacy, thereby balancing security imperatives with public trust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta bioethica
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4067/s1726-569x2026000100041
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Defense: A Bioethical Examination of Societal Risks and Governance

Adel Ayed Alshammari
Acta bioethica
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Intelligence in Defense: A Bioethical Examination of Societal Risks and Governance

Adel Ayed Alshammari
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the societal risks that may arise from the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into defense innovations and examines how the principle of responsibility can be achieved in this context.Using a qualitative descriptiveanalytical approach grounded in international reports and prior studies, the paper identifies four critical domains of societal risk: threats to human life, terrorist misuse, cyber and electronic warfare, and the lack of accountability for actions committed by autonomous or semi-autonomous systems.To address these challenges, a tri-level framework of responsibility is proposed -international, institutional, and socio-cultural-linking global ethical norms with local governance practices and moral values.The study argues that responsible innovation in AI-driven defense technologies requires ethical governance that ensures accountability, human oversight, and societal legitimacy, thereby balancing security imperatives with public trust.

Acta bioethicaVol. 32(1)
University of Hafr Al-Batin (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.