Hemodynamic mechanisms based on the “Five Differences” framework in critical illness

Critical illness is marked by life-threatening organ dysfunction with different characteristics. Although typical forms of critical illness have multiple subtypes, they tend to converge toward ischemic and hypoxic shock as the shared final stage. Understanding the hemodynamic mechanisms is difficult because of the complexity of interacting components. This article outlines five defining features of the progression of critical illness that I have named the “Five Differences” framework and describes four stages through which understanding of the hemodynamics of critical illness have evolved, that has shifted from a predominantly physical model to a biologically oriented paradigm. Furthermore, this article highlights the central role of hemodynamic instability and injury of critical units in the pathogenesis of critical illness, driven by the host/organ unregulated response. The Five Differences framework aims to provide a theoretical foundation for understanding the hemodynamic mechanisms that guide targeted clinical management of critical illness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hemodynamics
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/hd9.0000000000000018
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hemodynamic mechanisms based on the “Five Differences” framework in critical illness

Yidan Wang, Xiaoting Wang
Hemodynamics
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Hemodynamic mechanisms based on the “Five Differences” framework in critical illness

Yidan Wang, Xiaoting Wang
article en

Abstract

Critical illness is marked by life-threatening organ dysfunction with different characteristics. Although typical forms of critical illness have multiple subtypes, they tend to converge toward ischemic and hypoxic shock as the shared final stage. Understanding the hemodynamic mechanisms is difficult because of the complexity of interacting components. This article outlines five defining features of the progression of critical illness that I have named the “Five Differences” framework and describes four stages through which understanding of the hemodynamics of critical illness have evolved, that has shifted from a predominantly physical model to a biologically oriented paradigm. Furthermore, this article highlights the central role of hemodynamic instability and injury of critical units in the pathogenesis of critical illness, driven by the host/organ unregulated response. The Five Differences framework aims to provide a theoretical foundation for understanding the hemodynamic mechanisms that guide targeted clinical management of critical illness.

HemodynamicsVol. 2(1)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), Shandong Provincial QianFoShan Hospital (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hemodynamic mechanisms based on the “Five Differences” framework in critical illness — Yidan Wang, Xiaoting Wang · Hemodynamics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS