Enhancing college students’ AI literacy through generative AI use: a mixed-methods investigation

The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into higher education has created a paradoxical landscape for college students: while technological advancements offer unprecedented convenience, they simultaneously exacerbate the knowledge-practice gap in AI Literacy cultivation. Traditional educational frameworks struggle to address the dynamic interplay between AI-mediated learning environments, ethical dilemmas, and competency development, leaving a critical theoretical and practical void in literacy cultivation models. To bridge this gap, this study pioneered an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, combining qualitative interviews (<i>n</i> = 30) and quantitative surveys (<i>n</i> = 590, response rate 98.33%) to unravel the mechanisms through which GenAI use enhances students' AI Literacy. Qualitative analysis revealed a spiral-ascending literacy construction model characterized by iterative cycles of cognition-practice-evaluation, wherein 82% of participants demonstrated critical awareness of algorithmic biases and privacy risks. Quantitative results further validated a novel theoretical framework, showing that the social environment indirectly drives application practice via perceived impressions (path coefficient = 0.294, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with group needs fully mediating this relationship (<i>p</i> = 0.439 for the direct path). Structural equation modeling also identified key pathways linking perceived ease of use (<i>β</i> = 0.477) and technological expectations (<i>β</i> = 0.284) to behavioral adoption and future-oriented literacy. These findings challenge linear literacy models by emphasizing ecological dynamics and recursive learning processes, offering actionable insights for designing AI-integrated curricula and policies. Collectively, this research underscores the necessity of multi-dimensional interventions, combining cognitive scaffolding, ethical education, and skill training, to transform passive AI utilization into active literacy cultivation in the digital age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1728785
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing college students’ AI literacy through generative AI use: a mixed-methods investigation

J. WANG, Qi An, Bing Bai
Frontiers in Psychology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Enhancing college students’ AI literacy through generative AI use: a mixed-methods investigation

J. WANG, Qi An, Bing Bai
article en

Abstract

The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into higher education has created a paradoxical landscape for college students: while technological advancements offer unprecedented convenience, they simultaneously exacerbate the knowledge-practice gap in AI Literacy cultivation. Traditional educational frameworks struggle to address the dynamic interplay between AI-mediated learning environments, ethical dilemmas, and competency development, leaving a critical theoretical and practical void in literacy cultivation models. To bridge this gap, this study pioneered an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, combining qualitative interviews (<i>n</i> = 30) and quantitative surveys (<i>n</i> = 590, response rate 98.33%) to unravel the mechanisms through which GenAI use enhances students' AI Literacy. Qualitative analysis revealed a spiral-ascending literacy construction model characterized by iterative cycles of cognition-practice-evaluation, wherein 82% of participants demonstrated critical awareness of algorithmic biases and privacy risks. Quantitative results further validated a novel theoretical framework, showing that the social environment indirectly drives application practice via perceived impressions (path coefficient = 0.294, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with group needs fully mediating this relationship (<i>p</i> = 0.439 for the direct path). Structural equation modeling also identified key pathways linking perceived ease of use (<i>β</i> = 0.477) and technological expectations (<i>β</i> = 0.284) to behavioral adoption and future-oriented literacy. These findings challenge linear literacy models by emphasizing ecological dynamics and recursive learning processes, offering actionable insights for designing AI-integrated curricula and policies. Collectively, this research underscores the necessity of multi-dimensional interventions, combining cognitive scaffolding, ethical education, and skill training, to transform passive AI utilization into active literacy cultivation in the digital age.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CN), Northwest University (US), Cangzhou Normal University (CN)
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.