Pediatric Intensive Care Core Outcomes–a modified Delphi consensus process (PIC-CO)

Despite substantial improvements in survival after pediatric intensive care, long-term morbidity remains frequent and insufficiently assessed. No standardized, consensus-based core outcome set (COS) tailored to German-speaking regions exists. This study developed a Pediatric Intensive Care Core Outcome (PIC-CO) set to harmonize outcome assessment and follow-up of PICU survivors for clinical practice and research in German-speaking regions. A modified Delphi process was conducted within the Section of Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (SPIE) of the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. A multiprofessional expert panel identified outcome domains and questionnaires. Following internal consensus using predefined criteria, candidate questionnaires and short-term outcomes were submitted to an external Delphi survey distributed to SPIE members. Consensus and acceptance thresholds were defined a priori. Final questionnaire selection and recommendations for follow-up time points were agreed on by the expert panel. Seventeen experts participated in the internal consensus phase. Of 65 evaluated questionnaires, 1–3 questionnaires per domain and 11 short-term outcomes were submitted to the external survey (46 respondents). All short-term outcomes and at least one questionnaire per domain reached acceptance; the majority achieved consensus. The final PIC-CO set comprises seven questionnaires across six domains and 11 short-term outcomes, alongside a structured follow-up schedule. The PIC-CO set provides the first consensus-based, pragmatically implementable COS for pediatric critical care in German-speaking countries, enabling standardized long-term assessment for clinical practice and research. Substantial overlap with international initiatives was observed, with differences mainly related to cognitive assessment and domain structuring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-026-05878-1
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pediatric Intensive Care Core Outcomes–a modified Delphi consensus process (PIC-CO)

Victoria Lieftüchter, Jens H. Westhoff, Francesco Cardona, Christian Brickmann et al.
Critical Care
Delphi Technique in Research
article

Pediatric Intensive Care Core Outcomes–a modified Delphi consensus process (PIC-CO)

Victoria Lieftüchter, Jens H. Westhoff, Francesco Cardona, Christian Brickmann, Nora Bruns, Christine Müller-Brandes, Frida Regner, Michael Merker, Richard Biedermann, Angelina Beer, Stefanie Hort, Sarah Lampe, Nadine Mand, Hans Fuchs, Florian Hoffmann, Cynthia Pönicke, Christoph Härtel
article en

Abstract

Despite substantial improvements in survival after pediatric intensive care, long-term morbidity remains frequent and insufficiently assessed. No standardized, consensus-based core outcome set (COS) tailored to German-speaking regions exists. This study developed a Pediatric Intensive Care Core Outcome (PIC-CO) set to harmonize outcome assessment and follow-up of PICU survivors for clinical practice and research in German-speaking regions. A modified Delphi process was conducted within the Section of Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (SPIE) of the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. A multiprofessional expert panel identified outcome domains and questionnaires. Following internal consensus using predefined criteria, candidate questionnaires and short-term outcomes were submitted to an external Delphi survey distributed to SPIE members. Consensus and acceptance thresholds were defined a priori. Final questionnaire selection and recommendations for follow-up time points were agreed on by the expert panel. Seventeen experts participated in the internal consensus phase. Of 65 evaluated questionnaires, 1–3 questionnaires per domain and 11 short-term outcomes were submitted to the external survey (46 respondents). All short-term outcomes and at least one questionnaire per domain reached acceptance; the majority achieved consensus. The final PIC-CO set comprises seven questionnaires across six domains and 11 short-term outcomes, alongside a structured follow-up schedule. The PIC-CO set provides the first consensus-based, pragmatically implementable COS for pediatric critical care in German-speaking countries, enabling standardized long-term assessment for clinical practice and research. Substantial overlap with international initiatives was observed, with differences mainly related to cognitive assessment and domain structuring.

Critical Care
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University of Würzburg (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult (DE), München Klinik Schwabing (DE), Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna (AT), Essen University Hospital (DE), München Klinik (DE), Jena University Hospital (DE), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), Medical University of Vienna (AT), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.