Conceptualizing Science in Higher Education: Structural Relationships Between Understanding, Ethics, and Social Appropriation Among Undergraduates

This study examines the perceptions, learning sources, ethical–social associations, and academic influences that shape Ecuadorian undergraduate students’ relationship with science, incorporating a gender perspective. A cross-sectional quantitative design was employed using a survey administered to undergraduate students from four urban universities in Quito, Ecuador. Participants were recruited through institutional mailing lists and academic coordination channels, resulting in a non-probabilistic, institutionally distributed sample of 212 complete responses. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test the hypothesized relationships among latent constructs. The findings indicate an absence of statistically significant differences between genders, thereby suggesting a homogeneous perception of science. The results demonstrated that a robust correlation exists between conceptual understanding and ethical–social awareness. Furthermore, they indicated a significant relationship between the academic impact of science and personal and social appropriation. The originality of the study lies in its critical, intersectional and situated approach to conceptualizing science, with a focus on factors such as gender and educational context. The findings provide valuable insights for the design of educational policies that promote the social appropriation of science in Ecuador and Latin America.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030413
Primary Topic
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptualizing Science in Higher Education: Structural Relationships Between Understanding, Ethics, and Social Appropriation Among Undergraduates

Juan Ibujés-Villacís, Catya Torres Cordero
Education Sciences
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
article

Conceptualizing Science in Higher Education: Structural Relationships Between Understanding, Ethics, and Social Appropriation Among Undergraduates

Juan Ibujés-Villacís, Catya Torres Cordero
article en

Abstract

This study examines the perceptions, learning sources, ethical–social associations, and academic influences that shape Ecuadorian undergraduate students’ relationship with science, incorporating a gender perspective. A cross-sectional quantitative design was employed using a survey administered to undergraduate students from four urban universities in Quito, Ecuador. Participants were recruited through institutional mailing lists and academic coordination channels, resulting in a non-probabilistic, institutionally distributed sample of 212 complete responses. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test the hypothesized relationships among latent constructs. The findings indicate an absence of statistically significant differences between genders, thereby suggesting a homogeneous perception of science. The results demonstrated that a robust correlation exists between conceptual understanding and ethical–social awareness. Furthermore, they indicated a significant relationship between the academic impact of science and personal and social appropriation. The originality of the study lies in its critical, intersectional and situated approach to conceptualizing science, with a focus on factors such as gender and educational context. The findings provide valuable insights for the design of educational policies that promote the social appropriation of science in Ecuador and Latin America.

Education SciencesVol. 16(3)
Politecnica Salesiana University (EC), National Polytechnic School (EC)
Universidad Politécnica Salesiana del Ecuador
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.