Analysis of intellectual property strategies across different categories of digital therapeutics

Advances in digital technology and the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic have accelerated the digital transformation of healthcare. Digital therapeutics (DTx), which deliver evidence-based interventions through digital means to treat or prevent diseases, are expected to generate significant value in modern healthcare. Strategic intellectual property (IP) protection for DTx is essential to support development costs, including clinical trials, and to ensure sustainable innovation. This study analyzed patent and design right strategies across different categories of DTx. We examined 25 DTx products registered with the Digital Therapeutics Alliance in the United States and five U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved augmented and virtual reality products as of April 2023, classifying them into three categories: app-based, app + device-based, and entertainment-based DTx. Patent data were collected from the Derwent Innovation Index, and design rights were identified using the Patent Public Search. A case study of one representative product from each category was conducted to contextualize these findings. The results revealed that half of app-based DTx lacked patent applications, often relying on platform technologies, while all app + device-based DTx had patents covering programs, biometric acquisition, and platform technology. Entertainment-based DTx exhibited the highest average number of patent applications, possibly due to their novelty and divergence from conventional treatments. Only five of the 30 products were protected by design rights, which appeared limited in scope and practical utility. Overall, distinct differences in patenting approaches were observed among DTx types, with design rights used sparingly. These findings suggest that optimal IP strategies vary by product architecture and that understanding such distinctions is essential for promoting innovation in digital therapeutics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Digital Health
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2026.1743156
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of intellectual property strategies across different categories of digital therapeutics

Chikako Saotome, Hiroshi Suzuki, Tomoki Maeda
Frontiers in Digital Health
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

Analysis of intellectual property strategies across different categories of digital therapeutics

Chikako Saotome, Hiroshi Suzuki, Tomoki Maeda
article en

Abstract

Advances in digital technology and the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic have accelerated the digital transformation of healthcare. Digital therapeutics (DTx), which deliver evidence-based interventions through digital means to treat or prevent diseases, are expected to generate significant value in modern healthcare. Strategic intellectual property (IP) protection for DTx is essential to support development costs, including clinical trials, and to ensure sustainable innovation. This study analyzed patent and design right strategies across different categories of DTx. We examined 25 DTx products registered with the Digital Therapeutics Alliance in the United States and five U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved augmented and virtual reality products as of April 2023, classifying them into three categories: app-based, app + device-based, and entertainment-based DTx. Patent data were collected from the Derwent Innovation Index, and design rights were identified using the Patent Public Search. A case study of one representative product from each category was conducted to contextualize these findings. The results revealed that half of app-based DTx lacked patent applications, often relying on platform technologies, while all app + device-based DTx had patents covering programs, biometric acquisition, and platform technology. Entertainment-based DTx exhibited the highest average number of patent applications, possibly due to their novelty and divergence from conventional treatments. Only five of the 30 products were protected by design rights, which appeared limited in scope and practical utility. Overall, distinct differences in patenting approaches were observed among DTx types, with design rights used sparingly. These findings suggest that optimal IP strategies vary by product architecture and that understanding such distinctions is essential for promoting innovation in digital therapeutics.

Frontiers in Digital HealthVol. 8
Kyoto University (JP), Kyoto Medical Center (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.