Factors influencing inconclusive sex chromosomal aneuploidies results on non-invasive prenatal testing

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been gaining wider acceptance as the preferred screening test for detecting common fetal chromosomal aneuploidies. In addition, NIPT can also screen for sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCAs), namely Turner syndrome (45,X), Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY), Triple X syndrome (47,XXX), and Jacobs syndrome (47,XYY). Recently, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics 2022 guidelines recommend that NIPT should be offered to screen for SCAs in pregnant women with singleton pregnancies. In our experience, in 99.8% of pregnant women, the NIPT gave a conclusive result i.e. either low-risk or high-risk for SCAs. However, in the remaining 0.2%, an inconclusive result was released as the test parameters did not fall within the expected low-risk or high-risk score. In such cases, detailed ultrasound and further diagnostic testing with appropriate genetic counselling are recommended. In 30 of 183 samples with an inconclusive result, follow-up information from a diagnostic test was obtained. In most cases, i.e., in 40% (12/30), the diagnostic results did not reveal any abnormal findings. About 30% (9/30) of the cases presented with a history of vanishing twin. In about 10% (3/30) of the cases, the fetus had sex chromosomal abnormality (Monosomy X, 20% Mosaic XXX and XXY). In addition, in about 10% (3/30) of cases, the maternal biological background was confounding the NIPT result for the fetus, i.e., the pregnant woman was identified to have an SCA (2 XXX and Mosaic MX). Adverse outcomes such as intrauterine fetal demise and spontaneous miscarriage were observed in 6.7% (2/30) of cases (the reason for the adverse outcome could not be ascertained) and pregnancy was continued without any further investigations in 3.3% (1/30) of the cases. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of careful analysis of NIPT results when reporting SCAs. While NIPT offers superior sensitivity (99.6%) and specificity (99.8%) for screening SCAs, it is critical that pregnant women receive appropriate pre-test and post-test counseling to understand the clinical implications of inconclusive results, and the importance of further investigations to determine the fetus’s chromosomal status and in some cases of the mother.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wadia Journal of Women and Child Health
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/wjwch_40_2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
41.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing inconclusive sex chromosomal aneuploidies results on non-invasive prenatal testing

Angela Devanboo, Priya Kadam
1 citations
Wadia Journal of Women and Child Health
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
41.22
article

Factors influencing inconclusive sex chromosomal aneuploidies results on non-invasive prenatal testing

Angela Devanboo, Priya Kadam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been gaining wider acceptance as the preferred screening test for detecting common fetal chromosomal aneuploidies. In addition, NIPT can also screen for sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCAs), namely Turner syndrome (45,X), Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY), Triple X syndrome (47,XXX), and Jacobs syndrome (47,XYY). Recently, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics 2022 guidelines recommend that NIPT should be offered to screen for SCAs in pregnant women with singleton pregnancies. In our experience, in 99.8% of pregnant women, the NIPT gave a conclusive result i.e. either low-risk or high-risk for SCAs. However, in the remaining 0.2%, an inconclusive result was released as the test parameters did not fall within the expected low-risk or high-risk score. In such cases, detailed ultrasound and further diagnostic testing with appropriate genetic counselling are recommended. In 30 of 183 samples with an inconclusive result, follow-up information from a diagnostic test was obtained. In most cases, i.e., in 40% (12/30), the diagnostic results did not reveal any abnormal findings. About 30% (9/30) of the cases presented with a history of vanishing twin. In about 10% (3/30) of the cases, the fetus had sex chromosomal abnormality (Monosomy X, 20% Mosaic XXX and XXY). In addition, in about 10% (3/30) of cases, the maternal biological background was confounding the NIPT result for the fetus, i.e., the pregnant woman was identified to have an SCA (2 XXX and Mosaic MX). Adverse outcomes such as intrauterine fetal demise and spontaneous miscarriage were observed in 6.7% (2/30) of cases (the reason for the adverse outcome could not be ascertained) and pregnancy was continued without any further investigations in 3.3% (1/30) of the cases. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of careful analysis of NIPT results when reporting SCAs. While NIPT offers superior sensitivity (99.6%) and specificity (99.8%) for screening SCAs, it is critical that pregnant women receive appropriate pre-test and post-test counseling to understand the clinical implications of inconclusive results, and the importance of further investigations to determine the fetus’s chromosomal status and in some cases of the mother.

Wadia Journal of Women and Child HealthVol. 4
SciGenom Labs (India) (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
41.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.