Trends in testing effect research: from lab to classroom, but not yet for all learners

Active retrieval leads to better learning outcomes than passive study. This perspective, in which we analyze 23,850 publications, reveals an increasing focus on the educational applications of this testing effect but limited attention to subpopulations with learning disabilities. Using dyslexia as a case study, we identify theoretical grounds to question whether testing effects generalize universally, highlighting the need for empirical research. Future research should examine benefits of testing in neurodiverse learners to develop tailored interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Science of Learning
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00400-2
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends in testing effect research: from lab to classroom, but not yet for all learners

Florian Sense, Thomas Wilschut, Hedderik van Rijn
npj Science of Learning
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Trends in testing effect research: from lab to classroom, but not yet for all learners

Florian Sense, Thomas Wilschut, Hedderik van Rijn
article en

Abstract

Active retrieval leads to better learning outcomes than passive study. This perspective, in which we analyze 23,850 publications, reveals an increasing focus on the educational applications of this testing effect but limited attention to subpopulations with learning disabilities. Using dyslexia as a case study, we identify theoretical grounds to question whether testing effects generalize universally, highlighting the need for empirical research. Future research should examine benefits of testing in neurodiverse learners to develop tailored interventions.

npj Science of Learning
University of Groningen (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.