The Aarhus Prolonged Grief Disorder Scale (A-PGDs): identification of a clinically validated cut-off score for identifying bereaved at risk of PGD

<b>Background:</b> Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) is a new stress-related disorder included in both the ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR. It is characterised by persistent longing for and preoccupation with the deceased, accompanied by associated emotional symptoms. The Aarhus Prolonged Grief Disorder scale (A-PGDs) is a self-report measure based on these diagnostic criteria. A clinically validated straightforward scoring method may increase its clinical utility.<b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to establish a scoring procedure for identifying probable ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR PGD cases using the A-PGDs. Specifically, we sought to develop a two-step approach requiring endorsement of core symptoms and exceeding a cut-off score on associated symptoms.<b>Method:</b> Participants included bereaved adults (<i>n</i> = 122; 89.9% female) experiencing grief-related difficulties more than six months post loss. Optimal item thresholds for core symptoms were identified, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses determined the optimal cut-off score for associated symptoms. The Aarhus Structured Clinical Interview (A-PGDi) served as the gold standard.<b>Results:</b> Endorsing core symptoms at a threshold of ≥3 identified 81.1% (<i>n</i> = 99) of participants. For these individuals, a cut-off score of ≥27 on the associated symptom items produced sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 61%, respectively, for ICD-11 PGD, and a cut-off score of ≥29 produced sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 66%, respectively, for DSM-5-TR PGD. Using the full two-step method, sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 70% for ICD-11 PGD, and 78% and 74% for DSM-5-TR PGD. Prevalence estimates were 34.4% for probable ICD-11 PGD and 36.0% for DSM-5-TR PGD.<b>Conclusion:</b> This two-step scoring method provides a simple, easy-to-use approach for clinicians to identify probable PGD cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2026.2633003
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Aarhus Prolonged Grief Disorder Scale (A-PGDs): identification of a clinically validated cut-off score for identifying bereaved at risk of PGD

Enya Redican, Maria Louison Vang, Nicolai Lund Ladegaard, Maja O'Connor
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
article

The Aarhus Prolonged Grief Disorder Scale (A-PGDs): identification of a clinically validated cut-off score for identifying bereaved at risk of PGD

Enya Redican, Maria Louison Vang, Nicolai Lund Ladegaard, Maja O'Connor
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) is a new stress-related disorder included in both the ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR. It is characterised by persistent longing for and preoccupation with the deceased, accompanied by associated emotional symptoms. The Aarhus Prolonged Grief Disorder scale (A-PGDs) is a self-report measure based on these diagnostic criteria. A clinically validated straightforward scoring method may increase its clinical utility.<b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to establish a scoring procedure for identifying probable ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR PGD cases using the A-PGDs. Specifically, we sought to develop a two-step approach requiring endorsement of core symptoms and exceeding a cut-off score on associated symptoms.<b>Method:</b> Participants included bereaved adults (<i>n</i> = 122; 89.9% female) experiencing grief-related difficulties more than six months post loss. Optimal item thresholds for core symptoms were identified, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses determined the optimal cut-off score for associated symptoms. The Aarhus Structured Clinical Interview (A-PGDi) served as the gold standard.<b>Results:</b> Endorsing core symptoms at a threshold of ≥3 identified 81.1% (<i>n</i> = 99) of participants. For these individuals, a cut-off score of ≥27 on the associated symptom items produced sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 61%, respectively, for ICD-11 PGD, and a cut-off score of ≥29 produced sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 66%, respectively, for DSM-5-TR PGD. Using the full two-step method, sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 70% for ICD-11 PGD, and 78% and 74% for DSM-5-TR PGD. Prevalence estimates were 34.4% for probable ICD-11 PGD and 36.0% for DSM-5-TR PGD.<b>Conclusion:</b> This two-step scoring method provides a simple, easy-to-use approach for clinicians to identify probable PGD cases.

European Journal of PsychotraumatologyVol. 17(1)
University of Ulster (GB), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.