Clinician Perspectives on the Implementation of a Web-Based Tool to Support Shared Decision-Making for Mid-Adult HPV Vaccination

In 2019, the U.S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended shared clinical decision-making (SCDM) for HPV vaccination among unvaccinated adults aged 27–45 years (i.e., mid-adult). However, the implementation of this recommendation is challenging. This study assessed a decision tool, HPV Decide, designed to facilitate SCDM for mid-adult HPV vaccination. We used exploratory sequential mixed methods to gather stakeholder and provider perspectives on a beta version of HPV Decide. Qualitative feedback from providers and stakeholders (N = 24) was collected through semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data from health care providers (N = 600) on usability in clinical practice was collected via online surveys. Interviewees provided feedback on the preferred delivery method and timing, the need for support and training, and key barriers and facilitators to SCDM. Quantitative data showed that 68.3% of providers were likely to use the tool, 67% believed it could be easily integrated into practice, and 54% thought patients would be interested in using it. Findings suggest that a web-based decision tool to facilitate SCDM for mid-adult HPV vaccination is both acceptable and feasible for integration into clinical practice. Providers expressed strong preferences for clinic-based access and electronic delivery. Clinicians supported the integration of a web-based decision tools into clinical practice to enhance shared decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cancer Education
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-026-02847-8
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinician Perspectives on the Implementation of a Web-Based Tool to Support Shared Decision-Making for Mid-Adult HPV Vaccination

Jessica Grace, Gregory D. Zimet, Erika L. Thompson, Idara N. Akpan et al.
Journal of Cancer Education
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Clinician Perspectives on the Implementation of a Web-Based Tool to Support Shared Decision-Making for Mid-Adult HPV Vaccination

Jessica Grace, Gregory D. Zimet, Erika L. Thompson, Idara N. Akpan, Justin M. Luningham, Christopher W. Wheldon, Sarah A. Alkhatib, Ellen M. Daley, Jonathan Engler
article en

Abstract

In 2019, the U.S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended shared clinical decision-making (SCDM) for HPV vaccination among unvaccinated adults aged 27–45 years (i.e., mid-adult). However, the implementation of this recommendation is challenging. This study assessed a decision tool, HPV Decide, designed to facilitate SCDM for mid-adult HPV vaccination. We used exploratory sequential mixed methods to gather stakeholder and provider perspectives on a beta version of HPV Decide. Qualitative feedback from providers and stakeholders (N = 24) was collected through semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data from health care providers (N = 600) on usability in clinical practice was collected via online surveys. Interviewees provided feedback on the preferred delivery method and timing, the need for support and training, and key barriers and facilitators to SCDM. Quantitative data showed that 68.3% of providers were likely to use the tool, 67% believed it could be easily integrated into practice, and 54% thought patients would be interested in using it. Findings suggest that a web-based decision tool to facilitate SCDM for mid-adult HPV vaccination is both acceptable and feasible for integration into clinical practice. Providers expressed strong preferences for clinic-based access and electronic delivery. Clinicians supported the integration of a web-based decision tools into clinical practice to enhance shared decision-making.

Journal of Cancer Education
University of North Texas (US), Texas Christian University (US), University of North Texas Health Science Center (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), University of South Florida (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Temple University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.