Incognito standardized patients for studying healthcare stigma: partial deception and other ethical challenges
This paper examines the ethical considerations of using the incognito clinic visits by standardized patients (SP) in order to measure enacted stigma in healthcare settings. It reviews traditional SP methods, introduces the new method, and discusses its potential harms and benefits.
Authors
- Yunqing Fei
- S. Sylvia
- M. Kumi Smith
- Danyang Luo
- Siyan Meng
Institutions
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Emory University (US)
- Twin Cities Orthopedics (US)
- Center for Global Health (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Medical Ethics
- Published
- 2026-03-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01397-4
- Primary Topic
- Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- University of Minnesota
- National Institutes of Health