Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Monopsony Power: Evidence From China

ABSTRACT We study the effect of trade liberalization on firms' monopsony power in the labor market. We estimate firm‐specific markdowns from production data in the manufacturing industry and document the trends in China between 1998 and 2007. Taking China's entry to the WTO as a policy shock, we use a difference‐in‐differences (DiD) approach combined with an instrumental variable (IV) strategy to show that a one percentage point decrease in input tariff reduces markdown by 1.9%–2.2%. Moreover, we explain the pattern by constructing shift‐share trade shocks and find that the number of firms increases in regions more exposed to export expansion, and decreases in regions more exposed to import competition, while the net positive effect on firm number is associated with lower monopsony power. The results highlight the opposing impacts of import and export shocks and regional heterogeneity across labor markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of International Economics
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.70048
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Monopsony Power: Evidence From China

Dan Xie, Pengzhan Qian
Review of International Economics
Global trade and economics
article

Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Monopsony Power: Evidence From China

Dan Xie, Pengzhan Qian
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We study the effect of trade liberalization on firms' monopsony power in the labor market. We estimate firm‐specific markdowns from production data in the manufacturing industry and document the trends in China between 1998 and 2007. Taking China's entry to the WTO as a policy shock, we use a difference‐in‐differences (DiD) approach combined with an instrumental variable (IV) strategy to show that a one percentage point decrease in input tariff reduces markdown by 1.9%–2.2%. Moreover, we explain the pattern by constructing shift‐share trade shocks and find that the number of firms increases in regions more exposed to export expansion, and decreases in regions more exposed to import competition, while the net positive effect on firm number is associated with lower monopsony power. The results highlight the opposing impacts of import and export shocks and regional heterogeneity across labor markets.

Review of International Economics
University College Dublin (IE), Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.