Evaluating seasonal forecasts in Austria using agrometeorological indicators

Abstract Farmers rely on weather information to guide crop management; however, outcomes often remain uncertain until harvest. This pilot study evaluated downscaled medium- to seasonal-range forecasts for Austria (2018–2022), focusing on air temperature, precipitation, and six crop-independent agrometeorological indicators (stress and suitability metrics). Spatial downscaling enhanced temperature forecast performance, whereas gains for precipitation were limited. Agrometeorological indicators generally showed higher forecast accuracy at shorter lead times, although the magnitude of this effect varied among indicators. Warm springs in 2018–2019 led to temperature underestimation and reduced springtime accuracy, while Frost Stress Days were affected by a systematic cold bias during the study period. Indicators based on moderate temperature thresholds showed more robust performance than extreme-based ones. Sum of Effective Growing Temperature performed best, particularly for June-start forecasts, whereas Heat Wave Days showed limited operational suitability because of high false-alarm rates. Regional differences in forecast errors were significant for several indicators, with their magnitude and direction varying across climate regions. Site-level MAE was also significantly associated with altitude, mean temperature, and precipitation for several indicator-forecast combinations. For potential water balance, forecasts underestimated available water, consistent with combined temperature and precipitation biases. To enhance agricultural applicability, future studies should improve the accuracy of extreme-weather forecasts, calibrate models regionally, and integrate seasonal forecasts into user-friendly decision support systems. Given the short verification period (2018–2022), the results provide preliminary evidence of forecasting skill under the climatic conditions represented in the study period rather than robust long-term predictability estimates. Preprint available at https://zenodo.org/records/18890040 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-026-06692-z
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating seasonal forecasts in Austria using agrometeorological indicators

Gerhard Kubu, Sabina Thaler, Vojko Daneu, Josef Eitzinger et al.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
Climate change impacts on agriculture
article

Evaluating seasonal forecasts in Austria using agrometeorological indicators

Gerhard Kubu, Sabina Thaler, Vojko Daneu, Josef Eitzinger, Ahmad M. Manschadi, Aitor Atencia, M. Palka, Stefan Schneider
article en

Abstract

Abstract Farmers rely on weather information to guide crop management; however, outcomes often remain uncertain until harvest. This pilot study evaluated downscaled medium- to seasonal-range forecasts for Austria (2018–2022), focusing on air temperature, precipitation, and six crop-independent agrometeorological indicators (stress and suitability metrics). Spatial downscaling enhanced temperature forecast performance, whereas gains for precipitation were limited. Agrometeorological indicators generally showed higher forecast accuracy at shorter lead times, although the magnitude of this effect varied among indicators. Warm springs in 2018–2019 led to temperature underestimation and reduced springtime accuracy, while Frost Stress Days were affected by a systematic cold bias during the study period. Indicators based on moderate temperature thresholds showed more robust performance than extreme-based ones. Sum of Effective Growing Temperature performed best, particularly for June-start forecasts, whereas Heat Wave Days showed limited operational suitability because of high false-alarm rates. Regional differences in forecast errors were significant for several indicators, with their magnitude and direction varying across climate regions. Site-level MAE was also significantly associated with altitude, mean temperature, and precipitation for several indicator-forecast combinations. For potential water balance, forecasts underestimated available water, consistent with combined temperature and precipitation biases. To enhance agricultural applicability, future studies should improve the accuracy of extreme-weather forecasts, calibrate models regionally, and integrate seasonal forecasts into user-friendly decision support systems. Given the short verification period (2018–2022), the results provide preliminary evidence of forecasting skill under the climatic conditions represented in the study period rather than robust long-term predictability estimates. Preprint available at https://zenodo.org/records/18890040 .

Theoretical and Applied ClimatologyVol. 157(11)
Central Institution for Meteorology and Geodynamics (AT), Czech Academy of Sciences, Global Change Research Institute (CZ), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE), GeoSphere Austria (AT), BOKU University (AT)
Universität für Bodenkultur Wien
Zero hunger, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon