Assessment of landslide susceptibility using statistical and random forest methods in selected catchments in Kerala, India

Landslide mapping in Kerala is often conducted on spatially aggregated areas, limiting understanding of how landslide vary across different terrain types. This study addresses this gap by performing a comparative analysis of landslide susceptibility across five physiographically distinct catchments in Kerala, namely, Muthirapuzha, Pooyamkutty, Meenachil, Kuttiyadi, and Chaliyar using two different modeling approaches namely Random Forest (RF), representing machine learning techniques, and the Frequency Ratio (FR) method, representing conventional statistical approaches. Landslide susceptibility maps were developed by categorizing catchment areas into five classes, from Very Low to Very High . The conventional statistical approach, indicates that high and very high susceptibility zones together occupy 38.19% of Muthirapuzha, 20.21% of Meenachil, 22.12% of Kuttiyadi, 28.43% of Pooyamkutty, and 23.54% of Chaliyar. In contrast, the RF model produces a more differentiated spatial pattern, with high and very high susceptibility classes covering 31.49%, 25.42%, 38.58%, 32.99%, and 33.61% of the respective catchments. Model performance evaluation demonstrates the robustness of the RF approach, with AUC–ROC values of 0.87 (Chaliyar), 0.83 (Pooyamkutty), 0.93 (Muthirapuzha), 0.95 (Meenachil), and 0.96 (Kuttiyadi), and corresponding classification accuracies of 0.82, 0.76, 0.87, 0.90, and 0.88. Comparison with observed landslide inventories shows that actual landslide occurrences are comparable with the results obtained from RF method. These findings emphasise the influence of geomorphological, geological, and land-use characteristics on landslide occurrence in Kerala’s monsoon-dominated environment. The study highlights the capability of machine learning to capture complex, non-linear interactions among conditioning factors, offering improved tools for landslide hazard mapping and regional disaster risk management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Earth Science
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2026.1741697
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of landslide susceptibility using statistical and random forest methods in selected catchments in Kerala, India

Venkataramana Sridhar, R. Akhila, Fardeen Shahidi, Diya Deeptha et al.
Frontiers in Earth Science
Landslides and related hazards
article

Assessment of landslide susceptibility using statistical and random forest methods in selected catchments in Kerala, India

Venkataramana Sridhar, R. Akhila, Fardeen Shahidi, Diya Deeptha, K. Anamika, Harsha Das, Ganga Ajayaghosh, S. K. Pramada
article en

Abstract

Landslide mapping in Kerala is often conducted on spatially aggregated areas, limiting understanding of how landslide vary across different terrain types. This study addresses this gap by performing a comparative analysis of landslide susceptibility across five physiographically distinct catchments in Kerala, namely, Muthirapuzha, Pooyamkutty, Meenachil, Kuttiyadi, and Chaliyar using two different modeling approaches namely Random Forest (RF), representing machine learning techniques, and the Frequency Ratio (FR) method, representing conventional statistical approaches. Landslide susceptibility maps were developed by categorizing catchment areas into five classes, from Very Low to Very High . The conventional statistical approach, indicates that high and very high susceptibility zones together occupy 38.19% of Muthirapuzha, 20.21% of Meenachil, 22.12% of Kuttiyadi, 28.43% of Pooyamkutty, and 23.54% of Chaliyar. In contrast, the RF model produces a more differentiated spatial pattern, with high and very high susceptibility classes covering 31.49%, 25.42%, 38.58%, 32.99%, and 33.61% of the respective catchments. Model performance evaluation demonstrates the robustness of the RF approach, with AUC–ROC values of 0.87 (Chaliyar), 0.83 (Pooyamkutty), 0.93 (Muthirapuzha), 0.95 (Meenachil), and 0.96 (Kuttiyadi), and corresponding classification accuracies of 0.82, 0.76, 0.87, 0.90, and 0.88. Comparison with observed landslide inventories shows that actual landslide occurrences are comparable with the results obtained from RF method. These findings emphasise the influence of geomorphological, geological, and land-use characteristics on landslide occurrence in Kerala’s monsoon-dominated environment. The study highlights the capability of machine learning to capture complex, non-linear interactions among conditioning factors, offering improved tools for landslide hazard mapping and regional disaster risk management.

Frontiers in Earth ScienceVol. 14
Central University of Karnataka (IN), National Institute of Technology Calicut (IN), National Institute of Technology (JP), Virginia Tech (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.