Why We Cannot Separate Evidence From Values in Public Policy

ABSTRACT Whether or not any particular policy is adequate by EBP's own standard—being evidence‐based—cannot be decided without appeal to value‐based considerations. We support this claim in two steps. First, we argue that which evidence gets used in policy‐making depends on our value commitments, which are rarely made explicit, let alone being the subject of critical and transparent reflection. In other words, value commitments are not just important at the point of spelling out specific policy details and choosing between policy options but they are absolutely essential right from the very beginning of the policy‐making process: all the way from deciding which problem should be addressed by policy or regulation to determining which evidence to use and where to look for it. Second, in order to determine when we have enough evidence, we need to take into account relevant value‐based considerations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics &amp Policy
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.70109
Primary Topic
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why We Cannot Separate Evidence From Values in Public Policy

Hannah Rubin, Chad L. Hewitt, Katie Woolaston, Remco Heesen et al.
Politics &amp Policy
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
article

Why We Cannot Separate Evidence From Values in Public Policy

Hannah Rubin, Chad L. Hewitt, Katie Woolaston, Remco Heesen, Anne Schwenkenbecher, Evangelina Schwindt, Veli Mitova, Mike D. Schneider, Temitope O. Sogbanmu, Ricardo Kaufer, Hanna Metzen, Helena Slanickova, Alejandro Bortolus, Li‐an Yu, Emelda E. Chukwu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Whether or not any particular policy is adequate by EBP's own standard—being evidence‐based—cannot be decided without appeal to value‐based considerations. We support this claim in two steps. First, we argue that which evidence gets used in policy‐making depends on our value commitments, which are rarely made explicit, let alone being the subject of critical and transparent reflection. In other words, value commitments are not just important at the point of spelling out specific policy details and choosing between policy options but they are absolutely essential right from the very beginning of the policy‐making process: all the way from deciding which problem should be addressed by policy or regulation to determining which evidence to use and where to look for it. Second, in order to determine when we have enough evidence, we need to take into account relevant value‐based considerations.

Politics &amp PolicyVol. 54(2)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), University of Groningen (NL), Murdoch University (AU), Lincoln University (NZ), University of Konstanz (DE), University of Lagos (NG), University of Johannesburg (ZA), Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica (TW), ARL – Academy for Territorial Development in the Leibniz Association (DE), Centro Científico Tecnológico Patagónico (AR), Instituto de Biología Subtropical (AR), Nigerian Institute of Medical Research (NG), University of Missouri (US), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Volkswagen Foundation, Murdoch University, Universität Bielefeld, Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Forschung, Universität Bielefeld
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.