Structural Performance and Weight-Efficiency Trade-Offs of Bulb and Angle Stiffeners in Imperfection-Sensitive Plate Buckling and Collapse

This study presents a mechanics-based comparison of the buckling and ultimate strength behavior of stiffened plates reinforced with bulb-type and built-in angle stiffeners, with particular emphasis on the trade-off between structural performance and weight efficiency. Although these stiffener types are commonly treated as equivalent when designed to provide the same sectional moment of inertia, their nonlinear collapse behavior under realistic loading conditions has not been sufficiently quantified. To address this gap, a two-stage finite element framework is employed, consisting of linear eigenvalue buckling analysis to identify imperfection-sensitive modes, followed by geometrically and materially nonlinear imperfection analysis (GMNIA) to capture post-buckling behavior and ultimate strength. High-fidelity three-dimensional solid models incorporating classification-society-based material properties are used to simulate axially compressed stiffened plates representative of jack-up rig Living Quarter structures. The results demonstrate that, while both stiffener types exhibit comparable elastic buckling resistance, their nonlinear responses differ in terms of stiffness degradation, stress redistribution, and collapse localization. Importantly, the angle stiffener achieves an ultimate strength comparable to that of the elastically equivalent bulb stiffener while requiring less material, thereby exhibiting superior weight efficiency. These findings indicate that elastic equivalence alone is insufficient for optimal stiffener selection and highlight the necessity of nonlinear, imperfection-sensitive assessment in the design of lightweight and high-performance marine structures.