Public spaces and wellbeing: a scoping review of empirical research

• Scoping review of 27 empirical studies linking public spaces and wellbeing • Informality and passive sociability were two recurring enabling qualities • Most studies explored outdoor environments but valued their social dimensions • Indoor environments and their enabling qualities are underexplored • Future research should focus on intricacies of indoor places where public life occurs Public spaces have been recognized as important sites for wellbeing, a significance heightened by the Covid-19 pandemic. However, the vast body of studies and theorizing across disciplines complicates efforts to cultivate a straightforward understanding of the enabling mechanism. This scoping review organizes and synthesizes findings from 27 international, multidisciplinary studies to highlight the analytical insights at the intersection of the public space and wellbeing debate. Adopting a site-specific approach, the paper explores why certain places draw in people and how they foster positive experiences. The multifarious typologies of public spaces became evident, though many of the reviewed studies reported essentially similar observations about two enabling properties: informality and passive sociability. These qualities were also valued in studies of outdoor greenspaces, emphasizing the fundamental role of public spaces in affording low-key social engagement amongst strangers. This study also calls for future investigation into the underexplored wellbeing capacity of indoor leisure spaces, where much of everyday public life unfolds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wellbeing Space and Society
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2026.100377
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public spaces and wellbeing: a scoping review of empirical research

Xiaobo Shen
Wellbeing Space and Society
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Public spaces and wellbeing: a scoping review of empirical research

Xiaobo Shen
article en

Abstract

• Scoping review of 27 empirical studies linking public spaces and wellbeing • Informality and passive sociability were two recurring enabling qualities • Most studies explored outdoor environments but valued their social dimensions • Indoor environments and their enabling qualities are underexplored • Future research should focus on intricacies of indoor places where public life occurs Public spaces have been recognized as important sites for wellbeing, a significance heightened by the Covid-19 pandemic. However, the vast body of studies and theorizing across disciplines complicates efforts to cultivate a straightforward understanding of the enabling mechanism. This scoping review organizes and synthesizes findings from 27 international, multidisciplinary studies to highlight the analytical insights at the intersection of the public space and wellbeing debate. Adopting a site-specific approach, the paper explores why certain places draw in people and how they foster positive experiences. The multifarious typologies of public spaces became evident, though many of the reviewed studies reported essentially similar observations about two enabling properties: informality and passive sociability. These qualities were also valued in studies of outdoor greenspaces, emphasizing the fundamental role of public spaces in affording low-key social engagement amongst strangers. This study also calls for future investigation into the underexplored wellbeing capacity of indoor leisure spaces, where much of everyday public life unfolds.

Wellbeing Space and SocietyVol. 10
Roskilde University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.