Computational variant predictors for pharmacogenomics: from evaluation of single alleles to assessment of adverse drug reactions to antidepressants

Currently, pharmacogenetics relies on partially annotated star alleles, leaving novel variants and complex haplotypes uninterpretable. Computational scoring frameworks could overcome these limitations. Here, we comprehensively evaluated the ability of existing (CADD, FATHMM-XF, PROVEAN, MutationAssessor, SIFT, PhyloP100, APF, APF2) and novel (PharmGScore and PharmMLScore) variant effect predictors to assess pharmacogenetic alleles in multiple scenarios. Altogether we analyzed 541 PharmVar alleles, high‑throughput CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 mutational maps, and 200 642 UK Biobank exomes linked with health records containing antidepressant treatment outcomes. Many evaluated tools, especially ensemble frameworks, matched or exceeded star allele classifications (ROC‑AUC up to 0.85 for allele definitions, 0.95 in vitro; TPR up to 0.99 for exomes) and accurately predicted severe antidepressant adverse events for carriers of deleterious variants in CYP2C19 (OR 1.20-1.35). Our findings show that computational predictors deliver star allele accuracy while overcoming their limitations. With additional validation, computational tools could enhance clinical decision frameworks by enabling continuous scoring, incorporating previously unknown variants, and providing genome-wide applicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Pharmacogenomics Journal
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-026-00399-0
Primary Topic
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational variant predictors for pharmacogenomics: from evaluation of single alleles to assessment of adverse drug reactions to antidepressants

Gabriel Boyle, Marcin Piechota, Jacek Hajto, Paula Konowalska et al.
The Pharmacogenomics Journal
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
article

Computational variant predictors for pharmacogenomics: from evaluation of single alleles to assessment of adverse drug reactions to antidepressants

Gabriel Boyle, Marcin Piechota, Jacek Hajto, Paula Konowalska, Ilse Krätschmer, Michal Korostynski, Douglas M. Fowler, Malgorzata Borczyk
article en

Abstract

Currently, pharmacogenetics relies on partially annotated star alleles, leaving novel variants and complex haplotypes uninterpretable. Computational scoring frameworks could overcome these limitations. Here, we comprehensively evaluated the ability of existing (CADD, FATHMM-XF, PROVEAN, MutationAssessor, SIFT, PhyloP100, APF, APF2) and novel (PharmGScore and PharmMLScore) variant effect predictors to assess pharmacogenetic alleles in multiple scenarios. Altogether we analyzed 541 PharmVar alleles, high‑throughput CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 mutational maps, and 200 642 UK Biobank exomes linked with health records containing antidepressant treatment outcomes. Many evaluated tools, especially ensemble frameworks, matched or exceeded star allele classifications (ROC‑AUC up to 0.85 for allele definitions, 0.95 in vitro; TPR up to 0.99 for exomes) and accurately predicted severe antidepressant adverse events for carriers of deleterious variants in CYP2C19 (OR 1.20-1.35). Our findings show that computational predictors deliver star allele accuracy while overcoming their limitations. With additional validation, computational tools could enhance clinical decision frameworks by enabling continuous scoring, incorporating previously unknown variants, and providing genome-wide applicability.

The Pharmacogenomics JournalVol. 26(2)
Institute of Science and Technology Austria (AT), University of Washington (US), Maj Institute of Pharmacology (PL), Brotman Baty Institute (US), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Infrastruktura PL-Grid, National Institutes of Health, Academic Computer Centre Cyfronet, AGH University of Science and Technology
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.