The Social Construction of Leadership

The primary purpose of our theoretical essay is as a team of scholar-practitioners; we seek to bridge the gap between abstract sociological theory and the practical realities of organizational leadership. We aim to challenge the pervasive Great Man theories that still dominate the field by offering a theoretical vocabulary for what many practitioners intuitively feel but struggle to articulate. Our goal is to explore the theme of intra-subjective reality, which we define as the collective inner dialogue that shapes an organization. By demonstrating how leadership is not merely a set of individual traits but a dynamic and socially constructed reality, we hope to show how leaders can transition from being passive consumers of culture to active architects of interdependencies. This effort directly supports our daily work in leadership development by offering a framework that moves beyond the behavioral compliance often found in transactional leadership toward systemic awareness. We deliberately employed a synthesis of Berger and Luckmann's (1966) foundational sociology with modern institutional theory to deconstruct the objectivated nature of leadership norms. We mapped these theoretical concepts directly onto our Stages of Leadership model. This technique allows us to illustrate that understanding social construction is a learnable skill that evolves from unconscious adherence to systemic design toward intentional institutional entrepreneurship. By integrating these concepts, we aim to provide a practical tool that empowers practitioners to diagnose why their organizations may be stuck. This medium allows us to reframe accountability and blame, which are often sources of organizational stasis, as structural failures rather than individual moral failings. Ultimately, our work seeks to equip emerging leaders with the strategies necessary to engage in institutional work. This enables them to disrupt stagnant patterns and foster genuine human engagement within the complex environments we navigate daily.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Pinnacle A Journal by Scholar-Practitioners
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61643/c94488
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Social Construction of Leadership

Shane D. Soboroff, D. Levy, Christopher P. Kelley, Kurt A. Heppard et al.
The Pinnacle A Journal by Scholar-Practitioners
Management and Organizational Studies
article

The Social Construction of Leadership

Shane D. Soboroff, D. Levy, Christopher P. Kelley, Kurt A. Heppard, Kevin J. Davis, Steve Green
article en

Abstract

The primary purpose of our theoretical essay is as a team of scholar-practitioners; we seek to bridge the gap between abstract sociological theory and the practical realities of organizational leadership. We aim to challenge the pervasive Great Man theories that still dominate the field by offering a theoretical vocabulary for what many practitioners intuitively feel but struggle to articulate. Our goal is to explore the theme of intra-subjective reality, which we define as the collective inner dialogue that shapes an organization. By demonstrating how leadership is not merely a set of individual traits but a dynamic and socially constructed reality, we hope to show how leaders can transition from being passive consumers of culture to active architects of interdependencies. This effort directly supports our daily work in leadership development by offering a framework that moves beyond the behavioral compliance often found in transactional leadership toward systemic awareness. We deliberately employed a synthesis of Berger and Luckmann's (1966) foundational sociology with modern institutional theory to deconstruct the objectivated nature of leadership norms. We mapped these theoretical concepts directly onto our Stages of Leadership model. This technique allows us to illustrate that understanding social construction is a learnable skill that evolves from unconscious adherence to systemic design toward intentional institutional entrepreneurship. By integrating these concepts, we aim to provide a practical tool that empowers practitioners to diagnose why their organizations may be stuck. This medium allows us to reframe accountability and blame, which are often sources of organizational stasis, as structural failures rather than individual moral failings. Ultimately, our work seeks to equip emerging leaders with the strategies necessary to engage in institutional work. This enables them to disrupt stagnant patterns and foster genuine human engagement within the complex environments we navigate daily.

The Pinnacle A Journal by Scholar-PractitionersVol. 4(1)
United States Air Force Academy (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.