Non-destructive environmental DNA extracted from owl pellet contents: A valuable tool for monitoring mammalian species richness

Environmental DNA (eDNA) offers valuable presence/absence data for populations and has been widely used in comprehensive biodiversity assessments. However, applying eDNA in terrestrial environments poses unique challenges, particularly in obtaining samples that are representative of ecological communities. eDNA extracted from top-predator dietary samples can be an effective sampling source in monitoring prey populations. In this study, we tested a novel, non-destructive protocol to assess the efficacy of eDNA from barn owl (Tyto javanica delicatula) pellets as a tool for monitoring small mammal communities in an arid environment. We assessed the species composition and abundance of small mammals from owl pellets collected in the Simpson Desert in far western Queensland, Australia, using a three-tiered approach. We extracted DNA from 50 owl pellets and targeted a 16S mini-barcode for metabarcoding. We compared species detection via genetic analysis with that of morphological analysis, and finally with historical small mammal trapping data. The DNA extraction method presented here resulted in full preservation of prey bones and fur material for museum archival. eDNA detected four mammal species that were not detected via morphological pellet analysis, three of which are significant detections that had not been observed at this location before but were expected to occur based on likely distribution ranges. However, a key limitation of the eDNA approach demonstrated in this study, is that taxonomic identification was constrained by the completeness of reference databases, which can result in false negatives or ambiguous assignments. The results of the present study demonstrate that the specificity of an eDNA approach can offer advantages compared with morphological identification of mammalian remains from owl pellets, and that genetic owl pellet analysis may be particularly useful in full vertebrate diversity assessments that include reptiles, birds and amphibians that are unidentifiable from skeletal remains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344097
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-destructive environmental DNA extracted from owl pellet contents: A valuable tool for monitoring mammalian species richness

David A. Hurwood, Craig Windell, Pia Schoenefuss, Paul Whatmore et al.
PLoS ONE
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Non-destructive environmental DNA extracted from owl pellet contents: A valuable tool for monitoring mammalian species richness

David A. Hurwood, Craig Windell, Pia Schoenefuss, Paul Whatmore, Andrew Baker
article en

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) offers valuable presence/absence data for populations and has been widely used in comprehensive biodiversity assessments. However, applying eDNA in terrestrial environments poses unique challenges, particularly in obtaining samples that are representative of ecological communities. eDNA extracted from top-predator dietary samples can be an effective sampling source in monitoring prey populations. In this study, we tested a novel, non-destructive protocol to assess the efficacy of eDNA from barn owl (Tyto javanica delicatula) pellets as a tool for monitoring small mammal communities in an arid environment. We assessed the species composition and abundance of small mammals from owl pellets collected in the Simpson Desert in far western Queensland, Australia, using a three-tiered approach. We extracted DNA from 50 owl pellets and targeted a 16S mini-barcode for metabarcoding. We compared species detection via genetic analysis with that of morphological analysis, and finally with historical small mammal trapping data. The DNA extraction method presented here resulted in full preservation of prey bones and fur material for museum archival. eDNA detected four mammal species that were not detected via morphological pellet analysis, three of which are significant detections that had not been observed at this location before but were expected to occur based on likely distribution ranges. However, a key limitation of the eDNA approach demonstrated in this study, is that taxonomic identification was constrained by the completeness of reference databases, which can result in false negatives or ambiguous assignments. The results of the present study demonstrate that the specificity of an eDNA approach can offer advantages compared with morphological identification of mammalian remains from owl pellets, and that genetic owl pellet analysis may be particularly useful in full vertebrate diversity assessments that include reptiles, birds and amphibians that are unidentifiable from skeletal remains.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(3)
Bush Heritage Australia (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), Queensland Museum (AU)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.