Geopolitical rivalry and FDI location choice: evidence of strategic avoidance among Chinese, Japanese, and Korean firms during the first Trump era

This study examines how the outward FDI (OFDI) location choices of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean firms shifted amid rising geopolitical tensions during the first Trump administration. Using project-level data from fDi Markets covering 4020 greenfield investments in 61 countries, it identifies a pattern of geopolitically driven mutual avoidance. After 2017, Japanese and Korean firms became less likely to invest in countries with strong Chinese FDI presence, especially in R&D and manufacturing, while Chinese firms similarly avoided co-locating with Japanese and Korean firms. These patterns indicate that firms prioritized mitigating geopolitical and reputational risks over agglomeration benefits, leading to a decoupling of investment patterns. The study introduces “geopolitically driven FDI avoidance” as a counterpart to agglomeration theory, offering micro-level evidence of global value chain fragmentation under systemic shocks and highlighting implications for firms and policymakers navigating an increasingly bifurcated global investment environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia and the Global Economy
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aglobe.2026.100137
Primary Topic
International Business and FDI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geopolitical rivalry and FDI location choice: evidence of strategic avoidance among Chinese, Japanese, and Korean firms during the first Trump era

J. H. Park
Asia and the Global Economy
International Business and FDI
article

Geopolitical rivalry and FDI location choice: evidence of strategic avoidance among Chinese, Japanese, and Korean firms during the first Trump era

J. H. Park
article en

Abstract

This study examines how the outward FDI (OFDI) location choices of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean firms shifted amid rising geopolitical tensions during the first Trump administration. Using project-level data from fDi Markets covering 4020 greenfield investments in 61 countries, it identifies a pattern of geopolitically driven mutual avoidance. After 2017, Japanese and Korean firms became less likely to invest in countries with strong Chinese FDI presence, especially in R&D and manufacturing, while Chinese firms similarly avoided co-locating with Japanese and Korean firms. These patterns indicate that firms prioritized mitigating geopolitical and reputational risks over agglomeration benefits, leading to a decoupling of investment patterns. The study introduces “geopolitically driven FDI avoidance” as a counterpart to agglomeration theory, offering micro-level evidence of global value chain fragmentation under systemic shocks and highlighting implications for firms and policymakers navigating an increasingly bifurcated global investment environment.

Asia and the Global EconomyVol. 6(1)
Sogang University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
International Business and FDI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Geopolitical rivalry and FDI location choice: evidence of strategic avoidance among Chinese, Japanese, and Korean firms during the first Trump era — J. H. Park · Asia and the Global Economy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS