Robot-assisted elimination of side disparity in acetabular cup placement by right-handed surgeons during total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study of manual and robotic techniques

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) requires precise acetabular cup placement to ensure long-term success. Despite the widely accepted “safe zone,” manual THA outcomes can be influenced by surgeon handedness, leading to side-dependent disparities in cup positioning, especially among right-handed surgeons. This study aimed to compare the consistency of acetabular cup placement between left and right sides in robotic-assisted (RA-THA) versus manual THA (M-THA) performed by right-handed surgeons. A retrospective cohort of 220 patients who underwent primary unilateral THA via posterolateral approach was included. Patients were divided into RA-THA (n = 110) and M-THA (n = 110) groups, each further stratified by operative side (left/right). Radiographic parameters (inclination, anteversion, limb length discrepancy, femoral/acetabular offset), safe zone achievement, perioperative outcomes, and early clinical results were assessed. Results showed that in the M-THA group, left-side procedures exhibited significantly greater anteversion (25.5°±6.2° vs. 22.9°±3.8°, p = 0.009), larger limb length discrepancy (0.7 ± 0.3 mm vs. 0.5 ± 0.2 mm, p < 0.001), and greater offset deviations compared to right-side procedures. In contrast, the RA-THA group demonstrated no significant side-to-side differences in any radiographic parameters, with consistently higher safe zone placement rates (92.7–94.5%). Operative time was longer for left-side M-THA compared to right-side (p = 0.041), while RA-THA showed no such disparity. Early clinical outcomes and complication rates were comparable between groups. Robotic-assisted THA effectively eliminates side-dependent disparities in acetabular cup placement attributable to surgeon handedness, ensuring high precision and consistency regardless of operative side. While short-term functional outcomes are similar, robotic assistance provides a standardized technical foundation for long-term implant survivorship and may serve as an equalizing tool in surgical training and procedural standardization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-03286-9
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robot-assisted elimination of side disparity in acetabular cup placement by right-handed surgeons during total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study of manual and robotic techniques

Tao Dai, Shaojiang Liu, Mingyou Wang, Zhuodong Tang et al.
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Robot-assisted elimination of side disparity in acetabular cup placement by right-handed surgeons during total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study of manual and robotic techniques

Tao Dai, Shaojiang Liu, Mingyou Wang, Zhuodong Tang, Xunzhou Song, Zaihai Yang, Guocong Min, Yuping Lan, Heng Xiao, Hongping Wang
article en

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) requires precise acetabular cup placement to ensure long-term success. Despite the widely accepted “safe zone,” manual THA outcomes can be influenced by surgeon handedness, leading to side-dependent disparities in cup positioning, especially among right-handed surgeons. This study aimed to compare the consistency of acetabular cup placement between left and right sides in robotic-assisted (RA-THA) versus manual THA (M-THA) performed by right-handed surgeons. A retrospective cohort of 220 patients who underwent primary unilateral THA via posterolateral approach was included. Patients were divided into RA-THA (n = 110) and M-THA (n = 110) groups, each further stratified by operative side (left/right). Radiographic parameters (inclination, anteversion, limb length discrepancy, femoral/acetabular offset), safe zone achievement, perioperative outcomes, and early clinical results were assessed. Results showed that in the M-THA group, left-side procedures exhibited significantly greater anteversion (25.5°±6.2° vs. 22.9°±3.8°, p = 0.009), larger limb length discrepancy (0.7 ± 0.3 mm vs. 0.5 ± 0.2 mm, p < 0.001), and greater offset deviations compared to right-side procedures. In contrast, the RA-THA group demonstrated no significant side-to-side differences in any radiographic parameters, with consistently higher safe zone placement rates (92.7–94.5%). Operative time was longer for left-side M-THA compared to right-side (p = 0.041), while RA-THA showed no such disparity. Early clinical outcomes and complication rates were comparable between groups. Robotic-assisted THA effectively eliminates side-dependent disparities in acetabular cup placement attributable to surgeon handedness, ensuring high precision and consistency regardless of operative side. While short-term functional outcomes are similar, robotic assistance provides a standardized technical foundation for long-term implant survivorship and may serve as an equalizing tool in surgical training and procedural standardization.

Journal of Robotic SurgeryVol. 20(1)
Panzhihua Central Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.