Missed opportunity: structural barriers to inclusion in EU Community-Led Local Development

European cities are still entrenched in social inequalities, exacerbated by the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis and compounding austerity measures, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the ongoing Russia–Ukraine war. To mitigate inequalities, the European Union (EU) has promoted multilevel governance mechanisms, in particular Community-Led Local Development (CLLD), in order to empower local actors and foster inclusive growth. However, structural barriers continue to obstruct access to EU funds for the most marginalised communities. This article critically examines how urban development policies, shaped by neoliberal logics and the economisation of governance, have come to prioritise market efficiency over democratic participation and social equity. Drawing on qualitative research from seven European cities, we analyse how excessive bureaucracy, short-term project cycles, and the lack of genuine co-production systematically exclude grassroots actors and reinforce inequality. Our findings show that, despite an inclusive discourse, funding frameworks often privilege resource-rich organisations while further marginalising those most in need. We argue that these limitations are not incidental, but symptomatic of deeper governance structures that prioritise rapid, quantifiable outcomes over long-term, transformative social change. The paper calls for a recalibration of EU urban policy: one that centres co-creation, redistributes decision-making power, and meaningfully integrates community voices. Without such a shift, EU Cohesion Policy risks perpetuating the very exclusions it aims to resolve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Research & Practice
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2026.2641611
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Missed opportunity: structural barriers to inclusion in EU Community-Led Local Development

Joanna Kostka, Jekatyerina Dunajeva, Hanna Siarova, Iselin Mulvik
Urban Research & Practice
Regional Development and Policy
article

Missed opportunity: structural barriers to inclusion in EU Community-Led Local Development

Joanna Kostka, Jekatyerina Dunajeva, Hanna Siarova, Iselin Mulvik
article en

Abstract

European cities are still entrenched in social inequalities, exacerbated by the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis and compounding austerity measures, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the ongoing Russia–Ukraine war. To mitigate inequalities, the European Union (EU) has promoted multilevel governance mechanisms, in particular Community-Led Local Development (CLLD), in order to empower local actors and foster inclusive growth. However, structural barriers continue to obstruct access to EU funds for the most marginalised communities. This article critically examines how urban development policies, shaped by neoliberal logics and the economisation of governance, have come to prioritise market efficiency over democratic participation and social equity. Drawing on qualitative research from seven European cities, we analyse how excessive bureaucracy, short-term project cycles, and the lack of genuine co-production systematically exclude grassroots actors and reinforce inequality. Our findings show that, despite an inclusive discourse, funding frameworks often privilege resource-rich organisations while further marginalising those most in need. We argue that these limitations are not incidental, but symptomatic of deeper governance structures that prioritise rapid, quantifiable outcomes over long-term, transformative social change. The paper calls for a recalibration of EU urban policy: one that centres co-creation, redistributes decision-making power, and meaningfully integrates community voices. Without such a shift, EU Cohesion Policy risks perpetuating the very exclusions it aims to resolve.

Urban Research & Practice
Public Policy Institute of California (US), Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), Lancaster University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Regional Development and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Missed opportunity: structural barriers to inclusion in EU Community-Led Local Development — Joanna Kostka, Jekatyerina Dunajeva, et al. · Urban Research & Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS