The Effect of the High‐Probability Instructional Sequence Across Foods With Varying Levels of Participant Interaction

ABSTRACT We evaluated the utility of the high‐probability (high‐ p ) instructional sequence to increase bite acceptance and consumption of foods to which three children with autism spectrum disorder exhibited varying levels of interaction in a pre‐assessment. We first conducted food preference assessments to identify each participants' most preferred foods. Next, to identify high‐interaction, medium‐interaction, and low‐interaction foods, we conducted a food interaction assessment, which consisted of assessing participants' cooperation with instructions to touch, smell, and consume foods. We then incorporated the identified high‐preference foods into high‐ p instructions (i.e., “Take a bite of high‐p food ”) and evaluated their utility to increase cooperation with three low‐probability (low‐ p ) instructions (i.e., “Take a bite of low‐p food” ) for each participant. The low‐ p instructions varied according to the level of participant interaction with the food as identified in the food interaction assessment (i.e., foods presented in the low‐ p instruction were either high‐interaction, medium‐interaction, or low‐interaction foods). Results show that the high‐ p instructional sequence was effective to increase bite acceptance and consumption across all three levels of low‐probability instructions for one participant, but ineffective to increase acceptance and/or consumption for the other two participants. We discuss the utility of the high‐ p instructional sequence to increase food consumption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Interventions
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.70085
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of the High‐Probability Instructional Sequence Across Foods With Varying Levels of Participant Interaction

Christina Sheppard, Olivia Layman, David A. Wilder, Jonathan Fernand
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

The Effect of the High‐Probability Instructional Sequence Across Foods With Varying Levels of Participant Interaction

Christina Sheppard, Olivia Layman, David A. Wilder, Jonathan Fernand
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We evaluated the utility of the high‐probability (high‐ p ) instructional sequence to increase bite acceptance and consumption of foods to which three children with autism spectrum disorder exhibited varying levels of interaction in a pre‐assessment. We first conducted food preference assessments to identify each participants' most preferred foods. Next, to identify high‐interaction, medium‐interaction, and low‐interaction foods, we conducted a food interaction assessment, which consisted of assessing participants' cooperation with instructions to touch, smell, and consume foods. We then incorporated the identified high‐preference foods into high‐ p instructions (i.e., “Take a bite of high‐p food ”) and evaluated their utility to increase cooperation with three low‐probability (low‐ p ) instructions (i.e., “Take a bite of low‐p food” ) for each participant. The low‐ p instructions varied according to the level of participant interaction with the food as identified in the food interaction assessment (i.e., foods presented in the low‐ p instruction were either high‐interaction, medium‐interaction, or low‐interaction foods). Results show that the high‐ p instructional sequence was effective to increase bite acceptance and consumption across all three levels of low‐probability instructions for one participant, but ineffective to increase acceptance and/or consumption for the other two participants. We discuss the utility of the high‐ p instructional sequence to increase food consumption.

Behavioral InterventionsVol. 41(2)
Florida Institute of Technology (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.