No es Nada del Otro Mundo: Dissecting the racial and motivational predictors of the “Latino Vote”

Abstract The 2024 U.S. Presidential election highlighted Latine voters’ increasingly pivotal role in American politics, as their record‐high support for Republican candidates helped Donald Trump clinch the presidency. While many observers were surprised by this development, a historical look at Latines’ complex and shifting political allegiances exposes motivational processes amenable to social‐psychological analysis. Using two samples of U.S. Latines, we argue that their political behavior is traceable, in part, to differences in racial phenotypicality (i.e., the tendency to be perceived as “White” vs. “non‐White”) and desires for individual‐level power. Racial phenotypicality is theorized to influence the plausibility , and power motives the desirability , of psychological ties to the hegemonic national (i.e., American) group. Latines’ prioritization of national over ethnic identity, in turn, acts as a proximal determinant of pro‐Republican political affinities. In Study 1 ( N = 3753), greater physical resemblance to a prototypical (White, non‐Hispanic) American indirectly predicted affinity for Republicans in 2020 via increased feelings of inclusion in U.S. society and prioritization of American over Latine identity. In Study 2 ( N = 493), White racial phenotypicality heightened the link between power motives and positive attachment to Americanness, amplifying support for Republicans in 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Published
2026-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.70063
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No es Nada del Otro Mundo: Dissecting the racial and motivational predictors of the “Latino Vote”

Melissa Vega, Jaime L. Napier, Eric D. Knowles
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

No es Nada del Otro Mundo: Dissecting the racial and motivational predictors of the “Latino Vote”

Melissa Vega, Jaime L. Napier, Eric D. Knowles
article en

Abstract

Abstract The 2024 U.S. Presidential election highlighted Latine voters’ increasingly pivotal role in American politics, as their record‐high support for Republican candidates helped Donald Trump clinch the presidency. While many observers were surprised by this development, a historical look at Latines’ complex and shifting political allegiances exposes motivational processes amenable to social‐psychological analysis. Using two samples of U.S. Latines, we argue that their political behavior is traceable, in part, to differences in racial phenotypicality (i.e., the tendency to be perceived as “White” vs. “non‐White”) and desires for individual‐level power. Racial phenotypicality is theorized to influence the plausibility , and power motives the desirability , of psychological ties to the hegemonic national (i.e., American) group. Latines’ prioritization of national over ethnic identity, in turn, acts as a proximal determinant of pro‐Republican political affinities. In Study 1 ( N = 3753), greater physical resemblance to a prototypical (White, non‐Hispanic) American indirectly predicted affinity for Republicans in 2020 via increased feelings of inclusion in U.S. society and prioritization of American over Latine identity. In Study 2 ( N = 493), White racial phenotypicality heightened the link between power motives and positive attachment to Americanness, amplifying support for Republicans in 2024.

Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyVol. 26(1)
New York University Abu Dhabi (AE), New York University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.