The Criminal Law Regulatory Logic and Future Pathways of Gene Editing Technology in China: Seven Years After “Gene-Edited Babies”

The 2018 "gene-edited babies" incident marked a critical turning point in China's criminal regulation of gene editing.Before the incident, China largely relied on administrative rules and ethical guidelines to govern gene-editing activities, without a systematic criminal legal framework or comprehensive regulatory mechanisms.In the aftermath, China intensified its efforts to establish stronger legal controls over gene-editing technology.This study examines the regulatory landscape seven years after the event, integrating empirical data on public awareness and perceptions of gene editing with a literature-based legal analysis of the current legislative framework and its deficiencies.Through this dual approach, the paper aims to deepen understanding of the evolution of China's criminal regulation of gene editing and to provide policy insights for China and other developing countries seeking to strike a balance between scientific innovation and ethical as well as legal accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta bioethica
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4067/s1726-569x2026000100079
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Criminal Law Regulatory Logic and Future Pathways of Gene Editing Technology in China: Seven Years After “Gene-Edited Babies”

Li Zhenkang
Acta bioethica
Digital Transformation in Law
article

The Criminal Law Regulatory Logic and Future Pathways of Gene Editing Technology in China: Seven Years After “Gene-Edited Babies”

Li Zhenkang
article en

Abstract

The 2018 "gene-edited babies" incident marked a critical turning point in China's criminal regulation of gene editing.Before the incident, China largely relied on administrative rules and ethical guidelines to govern gene-editing activities, without a systematic criminal legal framework or comprehensive regulatory mechanisms.In the aftermath, China intensified its efforts to establish stronger legal controls over gene-editing technology.This study examines the regulatory landscape seven years after the event, integrating empirical data on public awareness and perceptions of gene editing with a literature-based legal analysis of the current legislative framework and its deficiencies.Through this dual approach, the paper aims to deepen understanding of the evolution of China's criminal regulation of gene editing and to provide policy insights for China and other developing countries seeking to strike a balance between scientific innovation and ethical as well as legal accountability.

Acta bioethicaVol. 32(1)
Southwest University of Political Science & Law (CN)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.