A comparative study of mesospheric zonal wind observations from Na lidar and multistatic meteor radars above Hefei, China

Abstract. This study compares zonal wind measurements from a Na lidar at the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) with those from the multistatic meteor radar system near Hefei, China. The meteor radar data used for comparison with the lidar include three sources: Mengcheng Meteor Radar (MCMR), Changfeng remote Receiver (CFR), and wind derived closer to the lidar beam using the Volume Velocity Processing (VVP) method. About 300 h of simultaneous, coincident observations from meteor radars and a Na lidar over 34 nights during 2022–2023, covering altitudes from 82 to 98 km, were analyzed. The parameters of zonal wind between lidar and meteor radar such as correlation coefficients, zonal wind mean, variance and zonal wind different are presented. Both monostatic meteor radar (MCMR and CFR) and multistatic meteor radars (VVP) zonal winds show good consistency with lidar zonal winds. Compared with monostatic radars, VVP zonal winds exhibit better agreement with the lidar above 90 km, both in zonal wind variance and radar-to-lidar zonal wind ratio. These results demonstrate that the VVP method provides a reliable approach for retrieving meteor radar winds and can improve wind estimates in the 90–98 km region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1697-2026
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of mesospheric zonal wind observations from Na lidar and multistatic meteor radars above Hefei, China

Wu Yi, Gunter Stober, X.D. Xue, Chao Ban et al.
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

A comparative study of mesospheric zonal wind observations from Na lidar and multistatic meteor radars above Hefei, China

Wu Yi, Gunter Stober, X.D. Xue, Chao Ban, Jie Zeng, Xin Fang, Weilin Pan, Tao Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract. This study compares zonal wind measurements from a Na lidar at the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) with those from the multistatic meteor radar system near Hefei, China. The meteor radar data used for comparison with the lidar include three sources: Mengcheng Meteor Radar (MCMR), Changfeng remote Receiver (CFR), and wind derived closer to the lidar beam using the Volume Velocity Processing (VVP) method. About 300 h of simultaneous, coincident observations from meteor radars and a Na lidar over 34 nights during 2022–2023, covering altitudes from 82 to 98 km, were analyzed. The parameters of zonal wind between lidar and meteor radar such as correlation coefficients, zonal wind mean, variance and zonal wind different are presented. Both monostatic meteor radar (MCMR and CFR) and multistatic meteor radars (VVP) zonal winds show good consistency with lidar zonal winds. Compared with monostatic radars, VVP zonal winds exhibit better agreement with the lidar above 90 km, both in zonal wind variance and radar-to-lidar zonal wind ratio. These results demonstrate that the VVP method provides a reliable approach for retrieving meteor radar winds and can improve wind estimates in the 90–98 km region.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 19(5)
University of Bern (CH), University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (CH), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.