Cold hardiness dynamics predict budbreak and associated low‐temperature threats in grapevine

Dormant buds of temperate woody perennial plants must attain cold hardiness to survive winters and timely lose it in spring to break bud while avoiding damage from low temperatures and late frosts. Therefore, we asked: Can a cold hardiness model be used to predict budbreak? Here, we used a previously published cold hardiness model to predict bud cold hardiness of three grapevine (Vitis spp.) varieties ('Cabernet-Sauvignon', 'Riesling', and 'Concord') from historical temperature records of eight locations in North America and Europe. Based on those predictions and thresholds of cold hardiness at budbreak from literature, budbreak date was extracted. Despite being untrained on budbreak data, the model resulted in good predictions (RMSE = 7.3d, n = 329), further improved based on expected delays from estimated cold damage (RMSE = 7.2d). Both increasing and decreasing freeze damage risk trends were predicted with increasing temperature, depending on the range of mean dormant season temperature (MDST; 1 Nov-30 Apr) in each location. Spring phenology predictions in relation to MDST also showed warming to advance (MDST < 10°C) or delay (MDST > 10°C) budbreak. Cold hardiness dynamics represent a key advancement in spring phenological modeling that provides information on low-temperature damage potential for the entire dormant season alongside improved predictions of budbreak timing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Phytologist
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.71074
Primary Topic
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cold hardiness dynamics predict budbreak and associated low‐temperature threats in grapevine

Terry Bates, Erica Kirchhof, Francisco Campos‐Arguedas, Michael G. North et al.
New Phytologist
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
article

Cold hardiness dynamics predict budbreak and associated low‐temperature threats in grapevine

Terry Bates, Erica Kirchhof, Francisco Campos‐Arguedas, Michael G. North, Jason P. Londo, Al P. Kovaleski, Benjamin Bois, Agnès Destrac‐Irvine, Cornelis van Leeuwen
article en

Abstract

Dormant buds of temperate woody perennial plants must attain cold hardiness to survive winters and timely lose it in spring to break bud while avoiding damage from low temperatures and late frosts. Therefore, we asked: Can a cold hardiness model be used to predict budbreak? Here, we used a previously published cold hardiness model to predict bud cold hardiness of three grapevine (Vitis spp.) varieties ('Cabernet-Sauvignon', 'Riesling', and 'Concord') from historical temperature records of eight locations in North America and Europe. Based on those predictions and thresholds of cold hardiness at budbreak from literature, budbreak date was extracted. Despite being untrained on budbreak data, the model resulted in good predictions (RMSE = 7.3d, n = 329), further improved based on expected delays from estimated cold damage (RMSE = 7.2d). Both increasing and decreasing freeze damage risk trends were predicted with increasing temperature, depending on the range of mean dormant season temperature (MDST; 1 Nov-30 Apr) in each location. Spring phenology predictions in relation to MDST also showed warming to advance (MDST < 10°C) or delay (MDST > 10°C) budbreak. Cold hardiness dynamics represent a key advancement in spring phenological modeling that provides information on low-temperature damage potential for the entire dormant season alongside improved predictions of budbreak timing.

New Phytologist
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Cornell University (US), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Unité mixte de recherche Œnologie (FR), Cornell Cooperative Extension Association of Jefferson County (US), Biogéosciences (FR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.