A scoping review of student involvement in curriculum development and reform: the silent majority?

This scoping review, covering literature published from 2003 to 2023, maps existing research on student involvement in curriculum development and reform and calls for deeper inquiry into their agency in decision-making. Curriculum development and reform are an important focus of education systems around the world. Yet curriculum making is a complex process, occurring across diverse contexts and involving multiple actors. Within schools, teachers and students play key roles in enacting curriculum. However, students frequently remain peripheral to development and reform processes. Efforts to involve students can be tokenistic or lack substantive impact, while research continues to neglect the role of student voice, leaving gaps in understanding how learners contribute to curriculum development, enactment and evaluation. Our review of 35 publications revealed that students are most frequently positioned as evaluators of curriculum reform, less often as informants and least as active participants, with only a few studies describing student engagement across two or all three roles. This review highlights the need for future research to embed student perspectives as a systemic, representative and democratic force in curriculum reform, rather than reducing them to a silent majority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Curriculum Studies
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2026.2634695
Primary Topic
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A scoping review of student involvement in curriculum development and reform: the silent majority?

Noryani Neni Ahmad Jamain, Andrea L. de Carvalho, Karen Maras, Meghan Stacey et al.
Journal of Curriculum Studies
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
article

A scoping review of student involvement in curriculum development and reform: the silent majority?

Noryani Neni Ahmad Jamain, Andrea L. de Carvalho, Karen Maras, Meghan Stacey, Dennis Alonzo, Troy McConachy
article en

Abstract

This scoping review, covering literature published from 2003 to 2023, maps existing research on student involvement in curriculum development and reform and calls for deeper inquiry into their agency in decision-making. Curriculum development and reform are an important focus of education systems around the world. Yet curriculum making is a complex process, occurring across diverse contexts and involving multiple actors. Within schools, teachers and students play key roles in enacting curriculum. However, students frequently remain peripheral to development and reform processes. Efforts to involve students can be tokenistic or lack substantive impact, while research continues to neglect the role of student voice, leaving gaps in understanding how learners contribute to curriculum development, enactment and evaluation. Our review of 35 publications revealed that students are most frequently positioned as evaluators of curriculum reform, less often as informants and least as active participants, with only a few studies describing student engagement across two or all three roles. This review highlights the need for future research to embed student perspectives as a systemic, representative and democratic force in curriculum reform, rather than reducing them to a silent majority.

Journal of Curriculum Studies
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.