A Phenomenological Investigation of Teacher Candidates’ Metaphorical Views on AI in Language Learning

The implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in education is gaining more attention, and as a result, more research is being conducted on the views and conceptualisations of AI by educators. The understanding of teacher candidates is vital for the AI integration in education, which should be human-centred, and still, there is a lack of studies focusing mainly on teacher candidates in the field of the native language. This qualitative phenomenological research aimed to explore metaphors of 46 Turkish language teacher candidates (third- and fourth-year undergraduates in Northern Cyprus) representing their answer to the prompt “AI is like because…”. The data were collected through open-ended questions and analysed using content analysis along with expert validation. Participants produced 46 valid metaphors, which were divided into five thematic categories: (1) AI as Teacher or Learner (21.7%), (2) AI as Method/Strategy (21.7%), (3) AI as Evolving Living Organism (13%), (4) AI as Guide/Helper (21.7%), and (5) AI as Danger/Threat (21.7%). Four groups expressed positive or neutral attitudes towards AI, such as considering it a clever teacher, a useful tool, a growing entity, or a guide. One category revealed negative views, perceiving AI as a destructive force. Overall, 78.3% of participants expressed optimistic views about AI, while 21.7% of them pointed to concerns. Turkish language teacher candidates generally perceive AI as a supportive, human-like assistant in the classroom, but a few of them express concerns about its existence. These results emphasise the importance of incorporating AI literacy and ethics into teacher education. Equipping future language teachers with the skills to use AI in the classroom might be a way of implementing AI in schools that is confident, critical, and human-centred.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ai7030100
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
52.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Phenomenological Investigation of Teacher Candidates’ Metaphorical Views on AI in Language Learning

Fatma Aslantürk Altıntuğ, Ahmet Güneyli, Esra Karabacak, Selma Korkmaz
1 citations
AI
AI in Service Interactions
52.10
article

A Phenomenological Investigation of Teacher Candidates’ Metaphorical Views on AI in Language Learning

Fatma Aslantürk Altıntuğ, Ahmet Güneyli, Esra Karabacak, Selma Korkmaz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in education is gaining more attention, and as a result, more research is being conducted on the views and conceptualisations of AI by educators. The understanding of teacher candidates is vital for the AI integration in education, which should be human-centred, and still, there is a lack of studies focusing mainly on teacher candidates in the field of the native language. This qualitative phenomenological research aimed to explore metaphors of 46 Turkish language teacher candidates (third- and fourth-year undergraduates in Northern Cyprus) representing their answer to the prompt “AI is like because…”. The data were collected through open-ended questions and analysed using content analysis along with expert validation. Participants produced 46 valid metaphors, which were divided into five thematic categories: (1) AI as Teacher or Learner (21.7%), (2) AI as Method/Strategy (21.7%), (3) AI as Evolving Living Organism (13%), (4) AI as Guide/Helper (21.7%), and (5) AI as Danger/Threat (21.7%). Four groups expressed positive or neutral attitudes towards AI, such as considering it a clever teacher, a useful tool, a growing entity, or a guide. One category revealed negative views, perceiving AI as a destructive force. Overall, 78.3% of participants expressed optimistic views about AI, while 21.7% of them pointed to concerns. Turkish language teacher candidates generally perceive AI as a supportive, human-like assistant in the classroom, but a few of them express concerns about its existence. These results emphasise the importance of incorporating AI literacy and ethics into teacher education. Equipping future language teachers with the skills to use AI in the classroom might be a way of implementing AI in schools that is confident, critical, and human-centred.

AIVol. 7(3)
European University of Lefke (TR), Ministry of Education and Culture (CY), Near East University (CY)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
AI in Service Interactions
52.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.