Patients Experiencing Unsuccessful Defibrillation From Implantable Cardiac Devices Remain at Elevated Risk Despite Procedural Management

Among a large cohort of patients with ICD, the incidence of failed defibrillator therapy was 2.8%. With appropriate patient selection, both operative and non-operative management led to similar long-term outcomes; however, the overall incidence of repeat failed defibrillation therapy remained high at 15%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70310
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patients Experiencing Unsuccessful Defibrillation From Implantable Cardiac Devices Remain at Elevated Risk Despite Procedural Management

Muazzum Shah, Krit Jongnarangsin, Nathaniel Christian‐Miller, Frank Pelosi et al.
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Patients Experiencing Unsuccessful Defibrillation From Implantable Cardiac Devices Remain at Elevated Risk Despite Procedural Management

Muazzum Shah, Krit Jongnarangsin, Nathaniel Christian‐Miller, Frank Pelosi, Jackson Jeikai Liang, Ryan Cunnane, Michael G. Ghannam, Amrish Deshmukh, Hakan Oral, Kelly Arps
article en

Abstract

Among a large cohort of patients with ICD, the incidence of failed defibrillator therapy was 2.8%. With appropriate patient selection, both operative and non-operative management led to similar long-term outcomes; however, the overall incidence of repeat failed defibrillation therapy remained high at 15%.

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
University of Michigan (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.