Paving the Way for ERAS in German Gynecologic and Gynecologic Oncology Departments: Insights into Barriers, Facilitators and Practical Strategies

<b>Background:</b> Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols improve postoperative outcomes and promote multidisciplinary, evidence-based perioperative care. However, ERAS adoption in gynecological departments remains inconsistent, and the underlying implementation challenges are poorly understood. <b>Objective:</b> To identify key barriers, facilitators, and preferred implementation strategies influencing ERAS adoption in German gynecological departments, and to assess whether clinicians' ERAS knowledge or institutional certification shapes these perceptions. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a nationwide, web-based cross-sectional survey of gynecologic clinicians in Germany. The questionnaire assessed ERAS-related knowledge, current implementation status, and perceived barriers, facilitators, and strategies. Statistical analyses included equality of proportions tests, logistic regression, and internal consistency measurement. <b>Results:</b> A total of 116 clinicians participated; 66 provided data on barriers and 64 on facilitators and strategies. Only 37.9% reported routine ERAS use. The most frequently identified barriers were limited ERAS knowledge (40.9% "very important") and insufficient personnel resources (40.9%). The strongest facilitators were improved patient well-being, reduced morbidity, and higher patient satisfaction (each >60% "very important"). High-impact implementation strategies included informational materials, workshops, and online training. Well-informed clinicians had significantly higher odds of reporting a positive professional impact of ERAS (OR = 9.0, <i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> ERAS implementation in gynecological settings remains restricted by staff knowledge gaps and personnel limitations. Patient-centered benefits and interactive educational strategies serve as powerful facilitators. Enhanced staff education and multidisciplinary support structures may substantially improve ERAS uptake and contribute to greater professional satisfaction among clinicians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14050682
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paving the Way for ERAS in German Gynecologic and Gynecologic Oncology Departments: Insights into Barriers, Facilitators and Practical Strategies

Kathrin Stewen, A Heimes, Roxana Schwab, Konstantin Hofmann et al.
Healthcare
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

Paving the Way for ERAS in German Gynecologic and Gynecologic Oncology Departments: Insights into Barriers, Facilitators and Practical Strategies

Kathrin Stewen, A Heimes, Roxana Schwab, Konstantin Hofmann, Lea Omogbehin, Ioannis Boutas, Lina Judit Schiestl, C. J. Thiel, Annette Hasenburg, Evangelos Papanikolaou, Katharina Delfs, Gilbert Georg Klamminger, Mona Wanda Schmidt, Georgios Tagarakis, Helena Schorling
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols improve postoperative outcomes and promote multidisciplinary, evidence-based perioperative care. However, ERAS adoption in gynecological departments remains inconsistent, and the underlying implementation challenges are poorly understood. <b>Objective:</b> To identify key barriers, facilitators, and preferred implementation strategies influencing ERAS adoption in German gynecological departments, and to assess whether clinicians' ERAS knowledge or institutional certification shapes these perceptions. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a nationwide, web-based cross-sectional survey of gynecologic clinicians in Germany. The questionnaire assessed ERAS-related knowledge, current implementation status, and perceived barriers, facilitators, and strategies. Statistical analyses included equality of proportions tests, logistic regression, and internal consistency measurement. <b>Results:</b> A total of 116 clinicians participated; 66 provided data on barriers and 64 on facilitators and strategies. Only 37.9% reported routine ERAS use. The most frequently identified barriers were limited ERAS knowledge (40.9% "very important") and insufficient personnel resources (40.9%). The strongest facilitators were improved patient well-being, reduced morbidity, and higher patient satisfaction (each >60% "very important"). High-impact implementation strategies included informational materials, workshops, and online training. Well-informed clinicians had significantly higher odds of reporting a positive professional impact of ERAS (OR = 9.0, <i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> ERAS implementation in gynecological settings remains restricted by staff knowledge gaps and personnel limitations. Patient-centered benefits and interactive educational strategies serve as powerful facilitators. Enhanced staff education and multidisciplinary support structures may substantially improve ERAS uptake and contribute to greater professional satisfaction among clinicians.

HealthcareVol. 14(5)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), LETO Maternity Hospital (GR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.