Automated Assessment of Ki-67 Labeling Index Using Cell-Level Detection and Classification in Whole-Slide Images

<b>Background</b>: The Ki-67 labeling index (LI) is a widely used marker of tumour proliferation, yet its manual assessment is time-consuming and subject to substantial inter-observer variability. Automated methods may improve reproducibility, but their clinical relevance depends on achieving performance comparable to expert pathologists. <b>Method</b>: We evaluated an artificial intelligence (AI)-based, cell-level system for automated Ki-67 LI assessment that detects and classifies individual tumour cell nuclei as Ki-67-positive or -negative. After nuclear detection using a pre-existing cell detection model, a lightweight convolutional neural network classifier operating on nucleus-centred patches was trained, and then applied to cases independently assessed by three pathologists. Agreement between AI-derived and human Ki-67 LI values was compared directly with inter-pathologist agreement across a range of proliferation levels. <b>Results</b>: The AI-based cell classification achieved 98% AUC on a test set consisting of 71K positive and 170K negative image patches centred on nuclei. On the automated Ki-67 LI assessment, the AI system demonstrated concordance with expert pathologists comparable to human inter-observer variability. <b>Conclusions</b>: These results support the potential of cell-level automated Ki-67 assessment as a reproducible decision-support tool for routine histopathological practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16050816
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Assessment of Ki-67 Labeling Index Using Cell-Level Detection and Classification in Whole-Slide Images

Fahdi Kanavati, Masayuki Tsuneki, Meng Li
Diagnostics
AI in cancer detection
article

Automated Assessment of Ki-67 Labeling Index Using Cell-Level Detection and Classification in Whole-Slide Images

Fahdi Kanavati, Masayuki Tsuneki, Meng Li
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: The Ki-67 labeling index (LI) is a widely used marker of tumour proliferation, yet its manual assessment is time-consuming and subject to substantial inter-observer variability. Automated methods may improve reproducibility, but their clinical relevance depends on achieving performance comparable to expert pathologists. <b>Method</b>: We evaluated an artificial intelligence (AI)-based, cell-level system for automated Ki-67 LI assessment that detects and classifies individual tumour cell nuclei as Ki-67-positive or -negative. After nuclear detection using a pre-existing cell detection model, a lightweight convolutional neural network classifier operating on nucleus-centred patches was trained, and then applied to cases independently assessed by three pathologists. Agreement between AI-derived and human Ki-67 LI values was compared directly with inter-pathologist agreement across a range of proliferation levels. <b>Results</b>: The AI-based cell classification achieved 98% AUC on a test set consisting of 71K positive and 170K negative image patches centred on nuclei. On the automated Ki-67 LI assessment, the AI system demonstrated concordance with expert pathologists comparable to human inter-observer variability. <b>Conclusions</b>: These results support the potential of cell-level automated Ki-67 assessment as a reproducible decision-support tool for routine histopathological practice.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(5)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.