GABA and Glx distinctively predict motor learning and retention in young and older adults

Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate are fundamental in neural plasticity. Motor learning is predicted by baseline levels of these metabolites and their modulation in the sensorimotor cortex (SM1), but less is known about the metabolic activity in other areas that support learning, such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), as well as the practice-induced metabolic modulation and age-associated differences. We investigated whether: a) motor learning induces a differential degree of metabolic modulation in the SM1 and DLPFC, b) learning tasks with higher difficulty levels enhance metabolic modulation as compared to those with lower difficulty levels, c) metabolic modulation during motor learning is age dependent, and d) training-induced metabolic modulation may have a differential effect on motor learning and retention. Young (n=25, 12 females) and older (n=21, 10 females) human adults completed a six-day motor learning protocol with Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) scans being administered before, during and after a low- and high task-complexity training condition. We observed a training-induced reduction of SM1 GABA+, regardless of age and task difficulty level, but no significant changes in DLPFC. Neither region showed a significant Glx (combined measure of Glutamate and Glutamine) modulation. In addition, baseline GABA+ levels predicted learning, but this effect was region and task-difficulty dependent. Age-related differences emerged in the prediction of retention, with older adults showing a beneficiary role of task-induced increase in the SM1 inhibitory tone. These results highlight the complexity of metabolic dynamics in learning and retention, showing their dependency on age, brain region and task difficulty.<b>Significance Statement</b> Excitatory and inhibitory metabolites are essential for learning. Although motor learning is linked to reduced GABA levels in the motor cortex, metabolic activity in other learning-related regions remains unclear. It is also unknown whether neuromodulations depend on task difficulty or age. We demonstrate that inhibitory metabolite levels decrease in the motor cortex, but not in the prefrontal cortex, independent of age and task difficulty. Notably, age-related differences emerged in the prediction of retention: in older adults, task-induced increases in SM1 inhibitory tone were associated with better retention performance, whereas no association was observed in young adults. These findings underscore the complex nature of metabolic dynamics underlying motor learning and retention, emphasizing their dependence on age, brain region, and task difficulty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1440-25.2026
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GABA and Glx distinctively predict motor learning and retention in young and older adults

Sima Chalavi, Mark E. Mikkelsen, Stephan P. Swinnen, Geraldine Rodriguez-Nieto et al.
Journal of Neuroscience
Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
article

GABA and Glx distinctively predict motor learning and retention in young and older adults

Sima Chalavi, Mark E. Mikkelsen, Stephan P. Swinnen, Geraldine Rodriguez-Nieto, Richard A. E. Edden, Hong Li
article en

Abstract

Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate are fundamental in neural plasticity. Motor learning is predicted by baseline levels of these metabolites and their modulation in the sensorimotor cortex (SM1), but less is known about the metabolic activity in other areas that support learning, such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), as well as the practice-induced metabolic modulation and age-associated differences. We investigated whether: a) motor learning induces a differential degree of metabolic modulation in the SM1 and DLPFC, b) learning tasks with higher difficulty levels enhance metabolic modulation as compared to those with lower difficulty levels, c) metabolic modulation during motor learning is age dependent, and d) training-induced metabolic modulation may have a differential effect on motor learning and retention. Young (n=25, 12 females) and older (n=21, 10 females) human adults completed a six-day motor learning protocol with Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) scans being administered before, during and after a low- and high task-complexity training condition. We observed a training-induced reduction of SM1 GABA+, regardless of age and task difficulty level, but no significant changes in DLPFC. Neither region showed a significant Glx (combined measure of Glutamate and Glutamine) modulation. In addition, baseline GABA+ levels predicted learning, but this effect was region and task-difficulty dependent. Age-related differences emerged in the prediction of retention, with older adults showing a beneficiary role of task-induced increase in the SM1 inhibitory tone. These results highlight the complexity of metabolic dynamics in learning and retention, showing their dependency on age, brain region and task difficulty.<b>Significance Statement</b> Excitatory and inhibitory metabolites are essential for learning. Although motor learning is linked to reduced GABA levels in the motor cortex, metabolic activity in other learning-related regions remains unclear. It is also unknown whether neuromodulations depend on task difficulty or age. We demonstrate that inhibitory metabolite levels decrease in the motor cortex, but not in the prefrontal cortex, independent of age and task difficulty. Notably, age-related differences emerged in the prediction of retention: in older adults, task-induced increases in SM1 inhibitory tone were associated with better retention performance, whereas no association was observed in young adults. These findings underscore the complex nature of metabolic dynamics underlying motor learning and retention, emphasizing their dependence on age, brain region, and task difficulty.

Journal of Neuroscience
Kennedy Krieger Institute (US), Allen Institute for Brain Science (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Cornell University (US), Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University (CN), VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research (BE), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.