Cause-and-effect approach to turbulence forecasting

Purpose Traditional modeling techniques for forecasting turbulence often rely on correlation-based criteria, which may select variables that correlate with the target without truly driving its dynamics. This limits model interpretability, generalization and efficiency. The purpose of this study is to overcome these limitations by introducing an observational causality-based approach to input selection that identifies the variables responsible for the future evolution of a target quantity while disregarding noncausal factors. Design/methodology/approach The authors’ approach is grounded in the synergistic-unique-redundant decomposition (SURD) of causality, which dissects the information that candidate inputs provide about a target variable into unique, redundant and synergistic causal components. These components are directly linked to the theoretical limits of predictive performance, quantified through the information-theoretic notion of irreducible error. To estimate these causal contributions in practice, the authors leverage neural mutual information estimators. The authors demonstrate the methodology by forecasting wall-shear stress using direct numerical simulation (DNS) data of turbulent channel flow. Findings The analysis reveals that variables with high unique or synergistic causal contributions enable compact forecasting models with strong predictive performance, whereas redundant variables can be excluded without compromising accuracy. Specifically, when predicting future wall-shear stress using two wall-parallel planes separated in the wall-normal direction, the streamwise velocity near the wall provides unique information about the target. In contrast, when both planes are located close to the wall, their information is largely redundant, and either can serve as input without degrading predictive accuracy. Finally, synergistic interactions emerge between different velocity components, which, when combined, enhance the prediction of future wall-shear stress beyond what each component achieves individually. Originality/value This work presents a causality-based approach for input selection in turbulence forecasting. The method quantifies the causal contributions of candidate variables to the prediction of a future quantity of interest and connects them to the fundamental limits of predictive accuracy achievable by any model. This enables more interpretable and compact models by reducing input dimensionality without sacrificing performance. Beyond turbulence, the approach provides a general-purpose tool for variable selection in scientific machine learning, flow control and data-driven modeling of complex systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat &amp Fluid Flow
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/hff-09-2025-0715
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cause-and-effect approach to turbulence forecasting

Álvaro Martínez-Sánchez, Adrián Lozano-Durán
International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat &amp Fluid Flow
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Cause-and-effect approach to turbulence forecasting

Álvaro Martínez-Sánchez, Adrián Lozano-Durán
article en

Abstract

Purpose Traditional modeling techniques for forecasting turbulence often rely on correlation-based criteria, which may select variables that correlate with the target without truly driving its dynamics. This limits model interpretability, generalization and efficiency. The purpose of this study is to overcome these limitations by introducing an observational causality-based approach to input selection that identifies the variables responsible for the future evolution of a target quantity while disregarding noncausal factors. Design/methodology/approach The authors’ approach is grounded in the synergistic-unique-redundant decomposition (SURD) of causality, which dissects the information that candidate inputs provide about a target variable into unique, redundant and synergistic causal components. These components are directly linked to the theoretical limits of predictive performance, quantified through the information-theoretic notion of irreducible error. To estimate these causal contributions in practice, the authors leverage neural mutual information estimators. The authors demonstrate the methodology by forecasting wall-shear stress using direct numerical simulation (DNS) data of turbulent channel flow. Findings The analysis reveals that variables with high unique or synergistic causal contributions enable compact forecasting models with strong predictive performance, whereas redundant variables can be excluded without compromising accuracy. Specifically, when predicting future wall-shear stress using two wall-parallel planes separated in the wall-normal direction, the streamwise velocity near the wall provides unique information about the target. In contrast, when both planes are located close to the wall, their information is largely redundant, and either can serve as input without degrading predictive accuracy. Finally, synergistic interactions emerge between different velocity components, which, when combined, enhance the prediction of future wall-shear stress beyond what each component achieves individually. Originality/value This work presents a causality-based approach for input selection in turbulence forecasting. The method quantifies the causal contributions of candidate variables to the prediction of a future quantity of interest and connects them to the fundamental limits of predictive accuracy achievable by any model. This enables more interpretable and compact models by reducing input dimensionality without sacrificing performance. Beyond turbulence, the approach provides a general-purpose tool for variable selection in scientific machine learning, flow control and data-driven modeling of complex systems.

International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat &amp Fluid Flow
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.