How do omission and commission errors of trait memory distrust relate to immediate and delayed suggestibility as measured by the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale?

The main purpose of the current study was to test the hypothesis that immediate and delayed suggestibility, measured by the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS 2), are more strongly associated with perceived susceptibility to commission errors in memory distrust than omission errors. There were 229 community participants, who had completed the GSS 2, and Memory Distrust Scale (MDS) and the Squire Subjective Memory Questionnaire (SSMQ). The MDS and the SSMQ measure people's beliefs about their susceptibility to memory errors of commission and omission, respectively. There were several important findings. The main finding in common across the MDS and SSMQ was a significant negative relationship between GSS 2 memory recall and trait memory distrust. This was a robust finding and suggests that both commission and commission memory trust are associated with poorer objective memory recall. In contrast, only the MDS score was significantly correlated with GSS 2 confabulation, Yield 1, Yield 2, 'direct explanation' explanation resistant behavioural responses, and delayed suggestibility at 1 week follow-up. In contrast GSS 2 Shift correlated significantly with the SSMQ score but not the MDS score. The main implications of the findings are that commission errors, as measured by the MDS, are more associated with both immediate and delayed suggestibility than omission errors, and Shift with omission errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1774327
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do omission and commission errors of trait memory distrust relate to immediate and delayed suggestibility as measured by the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale?

Monia Vagni, Valeria Giostra, Gisli H. Gudjónsson
Frontiers in Psychology
Memory Processes and Influences
article

How do omission and commission errors of trait memory distrust relate to immediate and delayed suggestibility as measured by the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale?

Monia Vagni, Valeria Giostra, Gisli H. Gudjónsson
article en

Abstract

The main purpose of the current study was to test the hypothesis that immediate and delayed suggestibility, measured by the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS 2), are more strongly associated with perceived susceptibility to commission errors in memory distrust than omission errors. There were 229 community participants, who had completed the GSS 2, and Memory Distrust Scale (MDS) and the Squire Subjective Memory Questionnaire (SSMQ). The MDS and the SSMQ measure people's beliefs about their susceptibility to memory errors of commission and omission, respectively. There were several important findings. The main finding in common across the MDS and SSMQ was a significant negative relationship between GSS 2 memory recall and trait memory distrust. This was a robust finding and suggests that both commission and commission memory trust are associated with poorer objective memory recall. In contrast, only the MDS score was significantly correlated with GSS 2 confabulation, Yield 1, Yield 2, 'direct explanation' explanation resistant behavioural responses, and delayed suggestibility at 1 week follow-up. In contrast GSS 2 Shift correlated significantly with the SSMQ score but not the MDS score. The main implications of the findings are that commission errors, as measured by the MDS, are more associated with both immediate and delayed suggestibility than omission errors, and Shift with omission errors.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
King's College London (GB), University of Urbino (IT), University of Perugia (IT)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.