Mechanical behaviour of aperiodic monotile minimal surface metamaterials

• Aperiodic monotile minimal surfaces generated using the boundary method • Mechanical properties quantified across randomised aperiodic configurations • Gaussian process models predict modulus, anisotropy, and their variances • Distinct stiffness trends arise from facet alignment in different topologies • Increasing RVE size reduces mechanical variability toward statistical homogeneity The recent discovery of the first aperiodic monotile has sparked widespread interest in its geometric and physical implications, leading to the identification of families of related tiles. Inspired by these developments, this study presents novel minimal surface shell structures enclosed within aperiodic monotiles and the mechanical response of these lightweight metamaterials is subsequently investigated. While previous works have largely examined the geometric uniqueness of planar aperiodic monotiles, this work presents minimal surfaces that tile aperiodically. Finite element analysis is employed to quantify the anisotropic stiffness characteristics of aperiodic monotile minimal surfaces across different orientations and local configurations. Statistical variations in the mechanical response are evaluated to capture the inherent sensitivity to the aperiodic arrangement. A Gaussian process regression model is then trained to estimate the effective mechanical properties and associated uncertainty across the design space, enabling rapid evaluation without full-scale simulation. The results demonstrate that aperiodic monotile minimal surfaces can achieve in-plane stiffness isotropy. This study establishes a framework for the design and optimisation of aperiodic minimal surface metamaterials, bridging geometric aperiodicity and mechanical functionality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thin-Walled Structures
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2026.114788
Primary Topic
Cellular and Composite Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanical behaviour of aperiodic monotile minimal surface metamaterials

Stephen Daynes
Thin-Walled Structures
Cellular and Composite Structures
article

Mechanical behaviour of aperiodic monotile minimal surface metamaterials

Stephen Daynes
article en

Abstract

• Aperiodic monotile minimal surfaces generated using the boundary method • Mechanical properties quantified across randomised aperiodic configurations • Gaussian process models predict modulus, anisotropy, and their variances • Distinct stiffness trends arise from facet alignment in different topologies • Increasing RVE size reduces mechanical variability toward statistical homogeneity The recent discovery of the first aperiodic monotile has sparked widespread interest in its geometric and physical implications, leading to the identification of families of related tiles. Inspired by these developments, this study presents novel minimal surface shell structures enclosed within aperiodic monotiles and the mechanical response of these lightweight metamaterials is subsequently investigated. While previous works have largely examined the geometric uniqueness of planar aperiodic monotiles, this work presents minimal surfaces that tile aperiodically. Finite element analysis is employed to quantify the anisotropic stiffness characteristics of aperiodic monotile minimal surfaces across different orientations and local configurations. Statistical variations in the mechanical response are evaluated to capture the inherent sensitivity to the aperiodic arrangement. A Gaussian process regression model is then trained to estimate the effective mechanical properties and associated uncertainty across the design space, enabling rapid evaluation without full-scale simulation. The results demonstrate that aperiodic monotile minimal surfaces can achieve in-plane stiffness isotropy. This study establishes a framework for the design and optimisation of aperiodic minimal surface metamaterials, bridging geometric aperiodicity and mechanical functionality.

Thin-Walled StructuresVol. 225
University of Canterbury (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Cellular and Composite Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mechanical behaviour of aperiodic monotile minimal surface metamaterials — Stephen Daynes · Thin-Walled Structures (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS