Many Roads to Failure: An Exploratory Vignette Study of Destructive Leadership

Abstract Destructive leadership manifests in multiple distinct behaviours (e.g. bullying, micromanaging, unethical behaviour). Yet, treating it as a monolithic construct risks conceptual ambiguity and obscures the unique causes and consequences of its different forms. Furthermore, research has largely neglected how followers’ personality tendencies shape their interpretations of and responses to these distinct forms of destructive leadership. Adopting a person‐situation perspective, the present study examines how different destructive leadership behaviours interact with followers' personality derailers to influence their emotions, behavioural reactions and job‐related outcomes. Using an experimental vignette design, we find distinct patterns of subordinate response: followers’ personality derailers align with interpersonal orientations (i.e. Moving Away, Moving Against, Moving Toward) that can yield adaptive or maladaptive outcomes depending on context. In doing so, this study advances a more nuanced understanding of destructive leadership processes and follower differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Management
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.70055
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Many Roads to Failure: An Exploratory Vignette Study of Destructive Leadership

Peter D. Harms, Younsung Cho
British Journal of Management
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
article

Many Roads to Failure: An Exploratory Vignette Study of Destructive Leadership

Peter D. Harms, Younsung Cho
article en

Abstract

Abstract Destructive leadership manifests in multiple distinct behaviours (e.g. bullying, micromanaging, unethical behaviour). Yet, treating it as a monolithic construct risks conceptual ambiguity and obscures the unique causes and consequences of its different forms. Furthermore, research has largely neglected how followers’ personality tendencies shape their interpretations of and responses to these distinct forms of destructive leadership. Adopting a person‐situation perspective, the present study examines how different destructive leadership behaviours interact with followers' personality derailers to influence their emotions, behavioural reactions and job‐related outcomes. Using an experimental vignette design, we find distinct patterns of subordinate response: followers’ personality derailers align with interpersonal orientations (i.e. Moving Away, Moving Against, Moving Toward) that can yield adaptive or maladaptive outcomes depending on context. In doing so, this study advances a more nuanced understanding of destructive leadership processes and follower differences.

British Journal of Management
University of Alabama (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.