Comparison of 2.2 mm vs. 2.6 mm corneal incisions in phacoemulsification in hard nuclear cataracts: impact on intraoperative energy and postoperative corneal recovery

The corneal incision size (2.2 mm versus 2.6 mm) did not influence the use of intraoperative ultrasound energy or result in differential corneal endothelial cell loss. However, smaller incisions (2.2 mm) were associated with increased short-term edema at the incision site, potentially impacting early wound healing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Ophthalmology
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2026.1732396
Primary Topic
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of 2.2 mm vs. 2.6 mm corneal incisions in phacoemulsification in hard nuclear cataracts: impact on intraoperative energy and postoperative corneal recovery

Binghe Xiao, L Ning, Maierdanjiang Ainiwaer, Yong Ji et al.
Frontiers in Ophthalmology
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
article

Comparison of 2.2 mm vs. 2.6 mm corneal incisions in phacoemulsification in hard nuclear cataracts: impact on intraoperative energy and postoperative corneal recovery

Binghe Xiao, L Ning, Maierdanjiang Ainiwaer, Yong Ji, Yingying Hong
article en

Abstract

The corneal incision size (2.2 mm versus 2.6 mm) did not influence the use of intraoperative ultrasound energy or result in differential corneal endothelial cell loss. However, smaller incisions (2.2 mm) were associated with increased short-term edema at the incision site, potentially impacting early wound healing.

Frontiers in OphthalmologyVol. 6
Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.