Innovating in payment models to support the adoption of innovative technologies in integrated care: A Delphi study

• Delphi explored payment models for innovation in IC, where evidence was lacking • Principles were identified to qualify innovations for innovative payment schemes • Technologies with significant therapeutic value should access novel payment models • HTA bodies should guide pricing negotiations and value-based use of innovations • DRG plus P4P was the only model achieving high consensus for technology uptake Payment’s mechanisms that facilitate the uptake of innovative technologies embedded in integrated care (IC) systems have not been described. This study aims to identify the principles that qualify innovations for inclusion in innovative payment schemes, as well as those that facilitate their uptake in IC. A two-round web-based Delphi was conducted to gather consensus among healthcare professionals, health economists, health technology assessment (HTA) professionals, payers, and managers. Statements were rated on a 6-point Likert scale, and consensus was classified as high, moderate, or low based on proportion of agreement-level responses and median score for each statement. Statements with moderate consensus were revised and re-evaluated in round 2. The first-round response rate was 51% (n=92/181); the second was 88% (n=80/92). The involvement of HTA in pricing negotiations along with the identification of the best-value scenarios for the innovation was the principle with the highest level of consensus and agreement. Among the payment models considered, only the combination of diagnostic-related-groups (DRG) and pay for performance (P4P) achieved high consensus. All the others reached moderate consensus (94%, n=15/16); however, most showed a high proportion of agreement-level responses (≥90%). The combination of DRG and P4P emerges as the most accepted pathway to accelerate innovation adoption. Establishing clear preconditions and guidance remains essential for successful implementation and high-quality patient care. Six additional novel schemes may also facilitate adoption. While some have been tested in real-world settings, further cases are required to assess feasibility and effectiveness across diverse healthcare contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Policy and Technology
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2026.101197
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovating in payment models to support the adoption of innovative technologies in integrated care: A Delphi study

Marcelo Soto, Laura Sampietro-Colom, Paula Closa-Granados
Health Policy and Technology
Delphi Technique in Research
article

Innovating in payment models to support the adoption of innovative technologies in integrated care: A Delphi study

Marcelo Soto, Laura Sampietro-Colom, Paula Closa-Granados
article en

Abstract

• Delphi explored payment models for innovation in IC, where evidence was lacking • Principles were identified to qualify innovations for innovative payment schemes • Technologies with significant therapeutic value should access novel payment models • HTA bodies should guide pricing negotiations and value-based use of innovations • DRG plus P4P was the only model achieving high consensus for technology uptake Payment’s mechanisms that facilitate the uptake of innovative technologies embedded in integrated care (IC) systems have not been described. This study aims to identify the principles that qualify innovations for inclusion in innovative payment schemes, as well as those that facilitate their uptake in IC. A two-round web-based Delphi was conducted to gather consensus among healthcare professionals, health economists, health technology assessment (HTA) professionals, payers, and managers. Statements were rated on a 6-point Likert scale, and consensus was classified as high, moderate, or low based on proportion of agreement-level responses and median score for each statement. Statements with moderate consensus were revised and re-evaluated in round 2. The first-round response rate was 51% (n=92/181); the second was 88% (n=80/92). The involvement of HTA in pricing negotiations along with the identification of the best-value scenarios for the innovation was the principle with the highest level of consensus and agreement. Among the payment models considered, only the combination of diagnostic-related-groups (DRG) and pay for performance (P4P) achieved high consensus. All the others reached moderate consensus (94%, n=15/16); however, most showed a high proportion of agreement-level responses (≥90%). The combination of DRG and P4P emerges as the most accepted pathway to accelerate innovation adoption. Establishing clear preconditions and guidance remains essential for successful implementation and high-quality patient care. Six additional novel schemes may also facilitate adoption. While some have been tested in real-world settings, further cases are required to assess feasibility and effectiveness across diverse healthcare contexts.

Health Policy and TechnologyVol. 15(5)
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.