Digital geo-spatial approaches for managing and planning complex historic cities: a comparison between Italian and European study cases

The paper explores how digital geospatial infrastructures can support the management of archaeological heritage in complex historic cities, focusing on their role as operational planning tools rather than mere descriptive archives. Drawing on the case of Santa Maria Capua Vetere – a medium-sized city built over the ancient Capua – the research illustrates how GIS-based systems integrate archaeological, morphological, and regulatory data to guide regeneration within dense urban fabrics. The methodology compares Italian and European experiences (Pisa, Verona, Bologna, Siracusa, Thessaloniki, Granada, Dubrovnik, Nicosia, Lisbon), evaluating database structures, planning integration, operational uses, and governance models. Results show a progressive shift from static mapping toward dynamic, decision-oriented infrastructures that foster interoperability, transparency, and adaptive conservation. The study demonstrates that geospatial analysis enables cities to reconcile buried heritage with contemporary urban functions, providing a replicable framework for sustainable management, archaeological risk awareness, and cultural valorisation within stratified urban contexts. Keywords: digital geo-spatial approach, archaeological heritage management, historic urban cities, spatial data infrastructures, heritage-led planning and governance

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6093/2284-4732/13374
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital geo-spatial approaches for managing and planning complex historic cities: a comparison between Italian and European study cases

Ivan Pistone
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Digital geo-spatial approaches for managing and planning complex historic cities: a comparison between Italian and European study cases

Ivan Pistone
article en

Abstract

The paper explores how digital geospatial infrastructures can support the management of archaeological heritage in complex historic cities, focusing on their role as operational planning tools rather than mere descriptive archives. Drawing on the case of Santa Maria Capua Vetere – a medium-sized city built over the ancient Capua – the research illustrates how GIS-based systems integrate archaeological, morphological, and regulatory data to guide regeneration within dense urban fabrics. The methodology compares Italian and European experiences (Pisa, Verona, Bologna, Siracusa, Thessaloniki, Granada, Dubrovnik, Nicosia, Lisbon), evaluating database structures, planning integration, operational uses, and governance models. Results show a progressive shift from static mapping toward dynamic, decision-oriented infrastructures that foster interoperability, transparency, and adaptive conservation. The study demonstrates that geospatial analysis enables cities to reconcile buried heritage with contemporary urban functions, providing a replicable framework for sustainable management, archaeological risk awareness, and cultural valorisation within stratified urban contexts. Keywords: digital geo-spatial approach, archaeological heritage management, historic urban cities, spatial data infrastructures, heritage-led planning and governance

Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.