Site-Dependent Variation in Phenolics and Antioxidant Capacity of Berberis vulgaris Raw Materials: A Multi-Assay Study

Plant phenolics are increasingly explored as natural antioxidants for food systems, yet antioxidant capacity data are difficult to compare because assay chemistry and geographic origin can influence outcomes. Moreover, conventional solvent-based assessments may underestimate the contribution of non-extractable phenolic fractions. Here, <i>Berberis vulgaris</i> L. raw materials from six Lithuanian habitats were assessed using hydrolyzed extracts to estimate total releasable phenolics following hydrolytic treatment: total phenolic content (Folin-Ciocalteu) and antioxidant capacity (FRAP, CUPRAC, ABTS, and DPPH) were measured, and fruit extracts were additionally profiled by HPLC-DAD and LC-MS. Across matrices, mean TPC was comparable (108.7 ± 14.1, 111.9 ± 8.4, and 121.9 ± 14.7 mg GAE/g DW for bark, leaves, and fruits, respectively). However, comparable bulk phenolic levels did not translate into uniform antioxidant responses across assays. In contrast, site effects were pronounced, with fruit TPC ranging from 80.0 ± 5.1 to 242.2 ± 61.0 mg GAE/g DW, indicating that geographic origin may outweigh morphological differences when bulk metrics are used. Antioxidant capacity assays further confirmed pronounced site-dependent variability. In particular, leaf extracts exhibited the largest geographic differences, with CUPRAC values ranging from 268.5 ± 32.8 to 586.2 ± 58.6 µmol TE/g DW and ABTS values ranging from 222.0 ± 43.1 to 562.9 ± 26.6 µmol TE/g DW across sampling sites, corresponding to approximately 2.2- and 2.5-fold variation, respectively. Moreover, assay-specific responses led to differences in matrix ranking: bark showed the highest FRAP reducing power (373.2 ± 15.9 µmol TE/g DW), whereas leaves exhibited the highest CUPRAC and ABTS activities (395.7 ± 46.7 and 346.6 ± 48.5 µmol TE/g DW, respectively). Chromatographic profiling of fruits revealed a structurally diverse set of phenolic acids and flavonoids, providing structural support for assay-dependent antioxidant behavior. Overall, integration of multi-assay antioxidant evaluation with hydrolysis-based phenolic assessment and chromatographic profiling provides a broader characterization of <i>Berberis vulgaris</i> as a plant matrix of interest for food applications. This integrated approach supports more context-aware interpretation of antioxidant data in applied food research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antioxidants
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox15030345
Primary Topic
Berberine and alkaloids research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Site-Dependent Variation in Phenolics and Antioxidant Capacity of Berberis vulgaris Raw Materials: A Multi-Assay Study

Asta Mažeikienė, Neringa Burokienė, Dovilė Dringelytė
Antioxidants
Berberine and alkaloids research
article

Site-Dependent Variation in Phenolics and Antioxidant Capacity of Berberis vulgaris Raw Materials: A Multi-Assay Study

Asta Mažeikienė, Neringa Burokienė, Dovilė Dringelytė
article en

Abstract

Plant phenolics are increasingly explored as natural antioxidants for food systems, yet antioxidant capacity data are difficult to compare because assay chemistry and geographic origin can influence outcomes. Moreover, conventional solvent-based assessments may underestimate the contribution of non-extractable phenolic fractions. Here, <i>Berberis vulgaris</i> L. raw materials from six Lithuanian habitats were assessed using hydrolyzed extracts to estimate total releasable phenolics following hydrolytic treatment: total phenolic content (Folin-Ciocalteu) and antioxidant capacity (FRAP, CUPRAC, ABTS, and DPPH) were measured, and fruit extracts were additionally profiled by HPLC-DAD and LC-MS. Across matrices, mean TPC was comparable (108.7 ± 14.1, 111.9 ± 8.4, and 121.9 ± 14.7 mg GAE/g DW for bark, leaves, and fruits, respectively). However, comparable bulk phenolic levels did not translate into uniform antioxidant responses across assays. In contrast, site effects were pronounced, with fruit TPC ranging from 80.0 ± 5.1 to 242.2 ± 61.0 mg GAE/g DW, indicating that geographic origin may outweigh morphological differences when bulk metrics are used. Antioxidant capacity assays further confirmed pronounced site-dependent variability. In particular, leaf extracts exhibited the largest geographic differences, with CUPRAC values ranging from 268.5 ± 32.8 to 586.2 ± 58.6 µmol TE/g DW and ABTS values ranging from 222.0 ± 43.1 to 562.9 ± 26.6 µmol TE/g DW across sampling sites, corresponding to approximately 2.2- and 2.5-fold variation, respectively. Moreover, assay-specific responses led to differences in matrix ranking: bark showed the highest FRAP reducing power (373.2 ± 15.9 µmol TE/g DW), whereas leaves exhibited the highest CUPRAC and ABTS activities (395.7 ± 46.7 and 346.6 ± 48.5 µmol TE/g DW, respectively). Chromatographic profiling of fruits revealed a structurally diverse set of phenolic acids and flavonoids, providing structural support for assay-dependent antioxidant behavior. Overall, integration of multi-assay antioxidant evaluation with hydrolysis-based phenolic assessment and chromatographic profiling provides a broader characterization of <i>Berberis vulgaris</i> as a plant matrix of interest for food applications. This integrated approach supports more context-aware interpretation of antioxidant data in applied food research.

AntioxidantsVol. 15(3)
Vilnius University (LT)
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Berberine and alkaloids research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.