From regulatory inertia to strategic vulnerability: a neoclassical realist analysis of Britain’s critical minerals under-balancing

Abstract This article uses neoclassical realism (NCR) to explain the United Kingdom’s ongoing failure to secure its critical mineral supply chains despite mounting systemic pressure from intensifying great-power competition. Structural realism predicts that states facing external threats will balance against adversaries. However, the UK exhibits a clear case of “under-balancing,” and maintains a dangerous dependence on China for materials indispensable to its economic and military power. This paper argues that this strategic incapacity stems not from a lack of awareness or resource scarcity, but from deeply entrenched domestic institutional constraints. The study introduces the concept of “Sovereign lethargy,” a distinct pathology of middle powers in the twenty-first century characterized by the inability to translate systemic pressure into coherent policy due to the veto power of domestic institutional friction. This lethargy leaves the UK strategically vulnerable in an era of weaponized interdependence and growing great power competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Politics
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-026-00752-x
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From regulatory inertia to strategic vulnerability: a neoclassical realist analysis of Britain’s critical minerals under-balancing

Doug Stokes
International Politics
Global Energy Security and Policy
article

From regulatory inertia to strategic vulnerability: a neoclassical realist analysis of Britain’s critical minerals under-balancing

Doug Stokes
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article uses neoclassical realism (NCR) to explain the United Kingdom’s ongoing failure to secure its critical mineral supply chains despite mounting systemic pressure from intensifying great-power competition. Structural realism predicts that states facing external threats will balance against adversaries. However, the UK exhibits a clear case of “under-balancing,” and maintains a dangerous dependence on China for materials indispensable to its economic and military power. This paper argues that this strategic incapacity stems not from a lack of awareness or resource scarcity, but from deeply entrenched domestic institutional constraints. The study introduces the concept of “Sovereign lethargy,” a distinct pathology of middle powers in the twenty-first century characterized by the inability to translate systemic pressure into coherent policy due to the veto power of domestic institutional friction. This lethargy leaves the UK strategically vulnerable in an era of weaponized interdependence and growing great power competition.

International Politics
MODUL University Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Global Energy Security and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.